Literature DB >> 17449116

Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations.

Michael S Smotherman1.   

Abstract

Somatosensory and auditory feedback mechanisms are dynamic components of the vocal motor pattern generator in mammals. This review explores how sensory cues arising from central auditory and somatosensory pathways actively guide the production of both simple sounds and complex phrases in mammals. While human speech is a uniquely sophisticated example of mammalian vocal behavior, other mammals can serve as examples of how sensory feedback guides complex vocal patterns. Echolocating bats in particular are unique in their absolute dependence on voice control for survival: these animals must constantly adjust the acoustic and temporal patterns of their orientation sounds to efficiently navigate and forage for insects at high speeds under the cover of darkness. Many species of bats also utter a broad repertoire of communication sounds. The functional neuroanatomy of the bat vocal motor pathway is basically identical to other mammals, but the acute significance of sensory feedback in echolocation has made this a profitable model system for studying general principles of sensorimotor integration with regard to vocalizing. Bats and humans are similar in that they both maintain precise control of many different voice parameters, both exhibit a similar suite of responses to altered auditory feedback, and for both the efficacy of sensory feedback depends upon behavioral context. By comparing similarities and differences in the ways sensory feedback influences voice in humans and bats, we may shed light on the basic architecture of the mammalian vocal motor system and perhaps be able to better distinguish those features of human vocal control that evolved uniquely in support of speech and language.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449116      PMCID: PMC1986653          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  115 in total

1.  Spectral and temporal gating mechanisms enhance the clutter rejection in the echolocating bat, Rhinolophus rouxi.

Authors:  I Neumann; G Schuller
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Inhibiting the Lombard effect.

Authors:  H L Pick; G M Siegel; P W Fox; S R Garber; J K Kearney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The resolution of target range by echolocating bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Oral and facial representation within the medullary and upper cervical dorsal horns in the cat.

Authors:  Y Shigenaga; I C Chen; S Suemune; T Nishimori; I D Nasution; A Yoshida; H Sato; T Okamoto; M Sera; M Hosoi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1986-01-15       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River Beluga.

Authors:  P M Scheifele; S Andrew; R A Cooper; M Darre; F E Musiek; L Max
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of duration of pitch-shifted feedback on vocal responses in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  S Kiran; C R Larson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The laryngeal sensory pathway and its role in phonation. A brain lesioning study in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  U Jürgens; A Kirzinger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Echo SPL, training experience, and experimental procedure influence the ranging performance in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  A Denzinger; H U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Vocal-acoustic circuitry and descending vocal pathways in teleost fish: convergence with terrestrial vertebrates reveals conserved traits.

Authors:  James L Goodson; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  The tiny difference between foraging and communication buzzes uttered by the Mexican free-tailed bat, Tadarida brasiliensis.

Authors:  Christine Schwartz; Jedidiah Tressler; Halli Keller; Marc Vanzant; Sarah Ezell; Michael Smotherman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  26 in total

1.  Disrupting vagal feedback affects birdsong motor control.

Authors:  Jorge M Méndez; Analía G Dall'asén; Franz Goller
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Audio-vocal responses elicited in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Torrey M Loucks; Deepa Suneel; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Attenuation of vocal responses to pitch perturbations during Mandarin speech.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Yi Xu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Social context rapidly modulates the influence of auditory feedback on avian vocal motor control.

Authors:  Jon T Sakata; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  The neurobiology of primate vocal communication.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Steven J Eliades
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Functional MRI assessment of orofacial articulators: neural correlates of lip, jaw, larynx, and tongue movements.

Authors:  Krystyna Grabski; Laurent Lamalle; Coriandre Vilain; Jean-Luc Schwartz; Nathalie Vallée; Irène Tropres; Monica Baciu; Jean-François Le Bas; Marc Sato
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Breathtaking Songs: Coordinating the Neural Circuits for Breathing and Singing.

Authors:  Marc F Schmidt; Franz Goller
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-11-01

8.  Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate.

Authors:  K G Munhall; E N MacDonald; S K Byrne; I Johnsrude
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  We're the Same... but Different: Addressing Academic Divides in the Study of Brain and Behavior.

Authors:  Zoe R Donaldson
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  The contribution of the parietal lobes to speaking and writing.

Authors:  Sonia L E Brownsett; Richard J S Wise
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.