Literature DB >> 9693992

Echo SPL, training experience, and experimental procedure influence the ranging performance in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

A Denzinger1, H U Schnitzler.   

Abstract

Four Eptesicus fuscus were trained in a range discrimination experiment to choose the closer of two phantom targets. Echo attenuation was roving between trials returning echoes ranging from -10 dB to -50 dB SPL (sound pressure level) relative to emission SPL. Discrimination thresholds were determined. After sufficient training, ranging performance was stable and about the same in the range between -20 dB and -50 dB with range difference thresholds around 300 microseconds. At -10 dB, performance was poor even after long training. After additional training at a constant relative echo SPL of -30 dB and a delay difference of 300 microseconds the performance measured with roving echo SPL improved at all relative echo SPL between -20 dB and -50 dB but not at -10 dB. The new experimental procedure improved the performance by additional learning, and the bats generalized over a wide range of relative echo SPL. Threshold improved to 100 microseconds when measured at a constant relative echo SPL of -30 dB, again indicating the influence of the experimental procedure. In correspondence to neurophysiological data the ranging performance deteriorates if the echo SPL is close to the emission SPL. Signal duration and emission SPL were variable during range discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9693992     DOI: 10.1007/s003590050249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  7 in total

1.  Discovering your inner bat: echo-acoustic target ranging in humans.

Authors:  Sven Schörnich; Andreas Nagy; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-23

2.  Spatial unmasking in the echolocating Big Brown Bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Susan Sümer; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations.

Authors:  Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Hunting bats adjust their echolocation to receive weak prey echoes for clutter reduction.

Authors:  Laura Stidsholt; Stefan Greif; Holger R Goerlitz; Kristian Beedholm; Jamie Macaulay; Mark Johnson; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Reduction of emission level in approach signals of greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis): No evidence for a closed loop control system for intensity compensation.

Authors:  Tobias Budenz; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Flutter sensitivity in FM bats. Part I: delay modulation.

Authors:  A Leonie Baier; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Flutter sensitivity in FM bats. Part II: amplitude modulation.

Authors:  A Leonie Baier; Kristin-Jasmin Stelzer; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 1.836

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.