Literature DB >> 19354405

Attenuation of vocal responses to pitch perturbations during Mandarin speech.

Hanjun Liu1, Yi Xu, Charles R Larson.   

Abstract

The effect of stimulus timing on vocal responses to pitch-shifted feedback was investigated in different intonation patterns during Mandarin speech production. While speaking a four-word sentence consisting of the high-level tone, where the fundamental frequency (F(0)) of the final word was either increased (question intonation) or slightly falling (statement intonation), pitch-shift stimuli (+/-100 cents, 200 ms duration) were presented at three different times (160, 240, or 340 ms) after vocal onset. Results showed that in the question intonation, response magnitudes (16 cents) were significantly reduced for the 340 ms condition compared to the 160 (26 cents) or 240 (23 cents) ms conditions. No significant differences were found, however, as a function of stimulus timing in the statement intonation. These findings demonstrate that a planned change in F(0) can cause a modulation in the reflexive response to a perturbation in voice pitch feedback and that there is a critical time period during which the response mechanisms are most sensitive to the planning process. These findings suggest an approach for the study of mechanisms involved in the timing of successive words during speech.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19354405      PMCID: PMC2677266          DOI: 10.1121/1.3081523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables.

Authors:  Thomas M Donath; Ulrich Natke; Karl Th Kalveram
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Significance of auditory and kinesthetic feedback to singers' pitch control.

Authors:  Dirk Mürbe; Friedemann Pabst; Gert Hofmann; Johan Sundberg
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Interactions between auditory and somatosensory feedback for voice F0 control.

Authors:  Charles R Larson; Kenneth W Altman; Hanjun Liu; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Changes in sound pressure and fundamental frequency contours following changes in hearing status.

Authors:  H Lane; J Wozniak; M Matthies; M Svirsky; J Perkell; M O'Connell; J Manzella
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.

Authors:  J L ELman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Phonetic disintegration in a five-year-old following sudden hearing loss.

Authors:  C A Binnie; R G Daniloff; H W Buckingham
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1982-05
View more
  9 in total

1.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of tonal native language on voice fundamental frequency responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalizations.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Emily Q Wang; Zhaocong Chen; Peng Liu; Charles R Larson; Dongfeng Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Voice fundamental frequency modulates vocal response to pitch perturbations during English speech.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; James Auger; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Age-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Nicole M Russo; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Differential effects of perturbation direction and magnitude on the neural processing of voice pitch feedback.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Michelle Meshman; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Modulation of auditory-vocal feedback control due to planned changes in voice fo.

Authors:  Jason H Kim; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Vocal responses to perturbations in voice auditory feedback in individuals with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Emily Q Wang; Leo Verhagen Metman; Charles R Larson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Speech compensation responses and sensorimotor adaptation to formant feedback perturbations.

Authors:  Inez Raharjo; Hardik Kothare; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Training of Working Memory Impacts Neural Processing of Vocal Pitch Regulation.

Authors:  Weifeng Li; Zhiqiang Guo; Jeffery A Jones; Xiyan Huang; Xi Chen; Peng Liu; Shaozhen Chen; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.