Literature DB >> 1941714

Spectral and temporal gating mechanisms enhance the clutter rejection in the echolocating bat, Rhinolophus rouxi.

I Neumann1, G Schuller.   

Abstract

Doppler shift compensation behaviour in horseshoe bats, Rhinolophus rouxi, was used to test the interference of pure tones and narrow band noise with compensation performance. The distortions in Doppler shift compensation to sinusoidally frequency shifted echoes (modulation frequency: 0.1 Hz, maximum frequency shift: 3 kHz) consisted of a reduced compensation amplitude and/or a shift of the emitted frequency to lower frequencies (Fig 2). Pure tones at frequencies between 200 and 900 Hz above the bat's resting frequency (RF) disturbed the Doppler shift compensation, with a maximum of interference between 400 and 550 Hz (Fig. 1). Minimum duration of pure tones for interference was 20 ms and durations above 40 ms were most effective (Fig. 3). Interfering pure tones arriving later than about 10 ms after the onset of the echolocation call showed markedly reduced interference (Fig. 4). Doppler shift compensation was affected by pure tones at the optimum interfering frequency with sound pressure levels down to -48 dB rel the intensity level of the emitted call (Fig. 5, 6). Narrow bandwidth noise (bandwidth from +/- 100 Hz to +/- 800 Hz) disturbed Doppler shift compensation at carrier frequencies between -250 Hz below and 800 Hz above RF with a maximum of interference between 250 and 500 Hz above resting frequency (Fig. 7). The duration and delay of the noise had similar influences on interference with Doppler shift compensation as did pure tones (Fig. 8, 9). Intensity dependence for noise interference was more variable than for pure tones (-32 dB to -45 dB rel emitted sound pressure level Fig. 10).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1941714     DOI: 10.1007/bf00198177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  1 in total

1.  Processing of noise by single units of the inferior colliculus of the bar Rhinolophus ferrumequinum.

Authors:  R Engelstätter; M Vater; G Neuweiler
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 3.208

  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  Fine control of call frequency by horseshoe bats.

Authors:  M Smotherman; W Metzner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  On-board telemetry of emitted sounds from free-flying bats: compensation for velocity and distance stabilizes echo frequency and amplitude.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Yu Shiori; Tatsuro Hosokawa; Hiroshi Riquimaroux; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Tinglei Jiang; Sean W Berquist; Jiang Feng; Walter Metzner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations.

Authors:  Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Sensorimotor Model of Obstacle Avoidance in Echolocating Bats.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Marc W Holderied; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.