Literature DB >> 19692513

Social context rapidly modulates the influence of auditory feedback on avian vocal motor control.

Jon T Sakata1, Michael S Brainard.   

Abstract

Sensory feedback is important for the learning and control of a variety of behaviors. Vocal motor production in songbirds is a powerful model system to study sensory influences on behavior because the learning, maintenance, and control of song are critically dependent on auditory feedback. Based on previous behavioral and neural experiments, it has been hypothesized that songs produced in isolation [undirected (UD) song] represent a form of vocal practice, whereas songs produced to females during courtship interactions [female-directed (FD) song] represent a form of vocal performance. According to this "practice versus performance" framework, auditory feedback should be more influential when birds engage in vocal practice than when they engage in vocal performance. To directly test this hypothesis, we used a computerized system to perturb auditory feedback at precise locations during the songs of Bengalese finches and compared the degree to which feedback perturbations caused song interruptions as well as changes to the sequencing and timing of syllables between interleaved renditions of UD and FD song. We found that feedback perturbation caused fewer song interruptions and smaller changes to syllable timing during FD song than during UD song. These data show that changes in the social context in which song is produced rapidly modulate the influence of auditory feedback on song control in a manner consistent with the practice versus performance framework. More generally, they indicate that, for song, as for other motor skills including human speech, the influence of sensory feedback on activity within vocal premotor circuitry can be dynamically modulated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19692513      PMCID: PMC2775389          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00340.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  99 in total

1.  Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback.

Authors:  A Leonardo; M Konishi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Postlearning consolidation of birdsong: stabilizing effects of age and anterior forebrain lesions.

Authors:  M S Brainard; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  The role of auditory feedback in birdsong.

Authors:  Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Experience-dependent neural substrates involved in vocal pitch regulation during singing.

Authors:  Jean Mary Zarate; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  For whom the bird sings: context-dependent gene expression.

Authors:  E D Jarvis; C Scharff; M R Grossman; J A Ramos; F Nottebohm
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Development of intrinsic and synaptic properties in a forebrain nucleus essential to avian song learning.

Authors:  F S Livingston; R Mooney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Fos-like immunoreactivity in catecholaminergic brain nuclei after territorial behavior in free-living song sparrows.

Authors:  Donna L Maney; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2003-08

9.  Song motor control organizes acoustic patterns on two levels in Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica).

Authors:  Yoshimasa Seki; Kenta Suzuki; Miki Takahasi; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Sequential super-stereotypy of an instinctive fixed action pattern in hyper-dopaminergic mutant mice: a model of obsessive compulsive disorder and Tourette's.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge; J Wayne Aldridge; Kimberly R Houchard; Xiaoxi Zhuang
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 7.431

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Integrating perspectives on vocal performance and consistency.

Authors:  Jon T Sakata; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  The role of auditory feedback in vocal learning and maintenance.

Authors:  Katherine Tschida; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Predicting plasticity: acute context-dependent changes to vocal performance predict long-term age-dependent changes.

Authors:  Logan S James; Jon T Sakata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Advantages of comparative studies in songbirds to understand the neural basis of sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  Karagh Murphy; Logan S James; Jon T Sakata; Jonathan F Prather
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Timing during transitions in Bengalese finch song: implications for motor sequencing.

Authors:  Todd W Troyer; Michael S Brainard; Kristofer E Bouchard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Temperature Manipulation in Songbird Brain Implicates the Premotor Nucleus HVC in Birdsong Syntax.

Authors:  Yisi S Zhang; Jason D Wittenbach; Dezhe Z Jin; Alexay A Kozhevnikov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Vocal motor changes beyond the sensitive period for song plasticity.

Authors:  Logan S James; Jon T Sakata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Children's development of self-regulation in speech production.

Authors:  Ewen N MacDonald; Elizabeth K Johnson; Jaime Forsythe; Paul Plante; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Auditory signal processing in communication: perception and performance of vocal sounds.

Authors:  Jonathan F Prather
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Manipulations of inhibition in cortical circuitry differentially affect spectral and temporal features of Bengalese finch song.

Authors:  Gaurav R Isola; Anca Vochin; Jon T Sakata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.