Literature DB >> 21113000

Disrupting vagal feedback affects birdsong motor control.

Jorge M Méndez1, Analía G Dall'asén, Franz Goller.   

Abstract

Coordination of different motor systems for sound production involves the use of feedback mechanisms. Song production in oscines is a well-established animal model for studying learned vocal behavior. Whereas the online use of auditory feedback has been studied in the songbird model, very little is known about the role of other feedback mechanisms. Auditory feedback is required for the maintenance of stereotyped adult song. In addition, the use of somatosensory feedback to maintain pressure during song has been demonstrated with experimentally induced fluctuations in air sac pressure. Feedback information mediating this response is thought to be routed to the central nervous system via afferent fibers of the vagus nerve. Here, we tested the effects of unilateral vagotomy on the peripheral motor patterns of song production and the acoustic features. Unilateral vagotomy caused a variety of disruptions and alterations to the respiratory pattern of song, some of which affected the acoustic structure of vocalizations. These changes were most pronounced a few days after nerve resection and varied between individuals. In the most extreme cases, the motor gestures of respiration were so severely disrupted that individual song syllables or the song motif were atypically terminated. Acoustic changes also suggest altered use of the two sound generators and upper vocal tract filtering, indicating that the disruption of vagal feedback caused changes to the motor program of all motor systems involved in song production and modification. This evidence for the use of vagal feedback by the song system with disruption of song during the first days after nerve cut provides a contrast to the longer-term effects of auditory feedback disruption. It suggests a significant role for somatosensory feedback that differs from that of auditory feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21113000      PMCID: PMC2992464          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.045369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  50 in total

1.  Adult Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) require real-time auditory feedback to produce normal song syntax.

Authors:  K Okanoya; A Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1997-10

2.  Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches.

Authors:  K W Nordeen; E J Nordeen
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1992-01

3.  Bengalese finches Lonchura Striata domestica depend upon auditory feedback for the maintenance of adult song.

Authors:  S M Woolley; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Pulmonary neuroepithelial bodies are innervated by vagal afferent nerves: an investigation with in vivo anterograde DiI tracing and confocal microscopy.

Authors:  A Van Lommel; J M Lauweryns; H R Berthoud
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1998-04

5.  Visual and somatosensory inputs to the avian song system via nucleus uvaeformis (Uva) and a comparison with the projections of a similar thalamic nucleus in a nonsongbird, Columba livia.

Authors:  J M Wild
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1994-11-22       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  The role of feedback from the vocal organ. I. Maintenance of stereotypical vocalizations by adult zebra finches.

Authors:  S W Bottjer; A P Arnold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The afferent and efferent myelinated fibres of the avian cervical vagus.

Authors:  A B Abdalla; A S King
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Role of syringeal muscles in gating airflow and sound production in singing brown thrashers.

Authors:  F Goller; R A Suthers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Manipulation of a central auditory representation shapes learned vocal output.

Authors:  Huimeng Lei; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Experimental determination of a unit of song production in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).

Authors:  J Cynx
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  8 in total

1.  Motor origin of precise synaptic inputs onto forebrain neurons driving a skilled behavior.

Authors:  Daniela Vallentin; Michael A Long
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sensory feedback independent pre-song vocalizations correlate with time to song initiation.

Authors:  Divya Rao; Satoshi Kojima; Raghav Rajan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Breathtaking Songs: Coordinating the Neural Circuits for Breathing and Singing.

Authors:  Marc F Schmidt; Franz Goller
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-11-01

4.  Characterization of respiratory neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla, an area critical for vocal production in songbirds.

Authors:  Judith McLean; Sarah Bricault; Marc F Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Vocal learning is constrained by the statistics of sensorimotor experience.

Authors:  Samuel J Sober; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Afferents from vocal motor and respiratory effectors are recruited during vocal production in juvenile songbirds.

Authors:  Sarah W Bottjer; Michelle To
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Breathing and vocal control: the respiratory system as both a driver and a target of telencephalic vocal motor circuits in songbirds.

Authors:  Marc F Schmidt; Judith McLean; Franz Goller
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 2.969

Review 8.  The respiratory-vocal system of songbirds: anatomy, physiology, and neural control.

Authors:  Marc F Schmidt; J Martin Wild
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.453

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.