Literature DB >> 17409186

Prevalence of positive selection among nearly neutral amino acid replacements in Drosophila.

Stanley A Sawyer1, John Parsch, Zhi Zhang, Daniel L Hartl.   

Abstract

We have estimated the selective effects of amino acid replacements in natural populations by comparing levels of polymorphism in 91 genes in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster with their divergence from Drosophila simulans. The genes include about equal numbers whose level of expression in adults is greater in males, greater in females, or approximately equal in the sexes. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods were used to sample key parameters in the stationary distribution of polymorphism and divergence in a model in which the selective effect of each nonsynonymous mutation is regarded as a random sample from some underlying normal distribution whose mean may differ from one gene to the next. Our analysis suggests that approximately 95% of all nonsynonymous mutations that could contribute to polymorphism or divergence are deleterious, and that the average proportion of deleterious amino acid polymorphisms in samples is approximately 70%. On the other hand, approximately 95% of fixed differences between species are positively selected, although the scaled selection coefficient (N(e)s) is very small. We estimate that approximately 46% of amino acid replacements have N(e)s < 2, approximately 84% have N(e)s < 4, and approximately 99% have N(e)s < 7. Although positive selection among amino acid differences between species seems pervasive, most of the selective effects could be regarded as nearly neutral. There are significant differences in selection between sex-biased and unbiased genes, which relate primarily to the mean of the distributions of mutational effects and the fraction of slightly deleterious and weakly beneficial mutations that are fixed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17409186      PMCID: PMC1871816          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701572104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  The cost of inbreeding in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Carlos D Bustamante; Rasmus Nielsen; Stanley A Sawyer; Kenneth M Olsen; Michael D Purugganan; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a multi-locus approach.

Authors:  Sascha Glinka; Lino Ometto; Sylvain Mousset; Wolfgang Stephan; David De Lorenzo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Adaptations to fluctuating selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ville Mustonen; Michael Lässig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Confidence interval for the number of selectively neutral amino acid polymorphisms.

Authors:  S A Sawyer; D E Dykhuizen; D L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila.

Authors:  Justin C Fay; Gerald J Wyckoff; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nick G C Smith; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression.

Authors:  Michael Parisi; Rachel Nuttall; Daniel Naiman; Gerard Bouffard; James Malley; Justen Andrews; Scott Eastman; Brian Oliver
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nicolas Bierne; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  61 in total

Review 1.  The role of robustness in phenotypic adaptation and innovation.

Authors:  Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  The effects of demography and linkage on the estimation of selection and mutation parameters.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Profile of Daniel L. Hartl.

Authors:  H Davis Tinsley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The other side of the nearly neutral theory, evidence of slightly advantageous back-mutations.

Authors:  Jane Charlesworth; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The new mutation theory of phenotypic evolution.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A recent adaptive transposable element insertion near highly conserved developmental loci in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Josefa González; J Michael Macpherson; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Synonymous and nonsynonymous polymorphisms versus divergences in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  Austin L Hughes; Robert Friedman; Pierre Rivailler; Jeffrey O French
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Lineage-specific differences in the amino acid substitution process.

Authors:  Snehalata Huzurbazar; Grigory Kolesov; Steven E Massey; Katherine C Harris; Alexander Churbanov; David A Liberles
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.