Literature DB >> 22005986

Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level.

Rowan D H Barrett1, Hopi E Hoekstra.   

Abstract

Although much progress has been made in identifying the genes (and, in rare cases, mutations) that contribute to phenotypic variation, less is known about the effects that these genes have on fitness. Nonetheless, genes are commonly labelled as 'adaptive' if an allele has been shown to affect a phenotype with known or suspected functional importance or if patterns of nucleotide variation at the locus are consistent with positive selection. In these cases, the 'adaptive' designation may be premature and may lead to incorrect conclusions about the relationships between gene function and fitness. Experiments to test targets and agents of natural selection within a genomic context are necessary for identifying the adaptive consequences of individual alleles.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22005986     DOI: 10.1038/nrg3015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN: 1471-0056            Impact factor:   53.242


  129 in total

1.  Integrating evolutionary and functional approaches to infer adaptation at specific loci.

Authors:  Jay F Storz; Christopher W Wheat
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  High Wolbachia density correlates with cost of infection for insecticide resistant Culex pipiens mosquitoes.

Authors:  Olivier Duron; Pierrick Labbé; Claire Berticat; François Rousset; Sylvain Guillot; Michel Raymond; Mylène Weill
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  The adaptive hypothesis of clinal variation revisited: single-locus clines as a result of spatially restricted gene flow.

Authors:  Anti Vasemägi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Fine mapping dissects pleiotropic growth quantitative trait locus into linked loci.

Authors:  Julian K Christians; Laura K Senger
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Barrick; Dong Su Yu; Sung Ho Yoon; Haeyoung Jeong; Tae Kwang Oh; Dominique Schneider; Richard E Lenski; Jihyun F Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Selection in nature: experimental manipulations of natural populations.

Authors:  David N Reznick; Cameron K Ghalambor
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.326

7.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.

Authors:  S J Gould; R C Lewontin
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

8.  Fitness effects associated with the major flowering time gene FRIGIDA in Arabidopsis thaliana in the field.

Authors:  Tonia M Korves; Karl J Schmid; Ana L Caicedo; Charlotte Mays; John R Stinchcombe; Michael D Purugganan; Johanna Schmitt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Constructing genomic maps of positive selection in humans: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Joshua M Akey
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Adaptive variation in beach mice produced by two interacting pigmentation genes.

Authors:  Cynthia C Steiner; Jesse N Weber; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  148 in total

1.  Arabidopsis thaliana as a model for the genetics of local adaptation.

Authors:  Brandon Gaut
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Where's the money? Inversions, genes, and the hunt for genomic targets of selection.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Andrew Kern
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Natural history collections as windows on evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Michael W Holmes; Talisin T Hammond; Guinevere O U Wogan; Rachel E Walsh; Katie LaBarbera; Elizabeth A Wommack; Felipe M Martins; Jeremy C Crawford; Katya L Mack; Luke M Bloch; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 4.  Ecological genomics of local adaptation.

Authors:  Outi Savolainen; Martin Lascoux; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  The evolutionary genetics of the genes underlying phenotypic associations for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda, Pinaceae).

Authors:  Andrew J Eckert; Jill L Wegrzyn; John D Liechty; Jennifer M Lee; W Patrick Cumbie; John M Davis; Barry Goldfarb; Carol A Loopstra; Sreenath R Palle; Tania Quesada; Charles H Langley; David B Neale
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A genomic perspective on the generation and maintenance of genetic diversity in herbivorous insects.

Authors:  Andrew D Gloss; Simon C Groen; Noah K Whiteman
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 13.915

7.  Genetic mapping of adaptation reveals fitness tradeoffs in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Jon Ågrena; Christopher G Oakley; John K McKay; John T Lovell; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Chromosomal inversions and ecotypic differentiation in Anopheles gambiae: the perspective from whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  R Rebecca Love; Aaron M Steele; Mamadou B Coulibaly; Sékou F Traore; Scott J Emrich; Michael C Fontaine; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Cis-regulatory variation in plant genomes and the impact of natural selection.

Authors:  Juliette de Meaux
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 10.  Finding the Genomic Basis of Local Adaptation: Pitfalls, Practical Solutions, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Sean Hoban; Joanna L Kelley; Katie E Lotterhos; Michael F Antolin; Gideon Bradburd; David B Lowry; Mary L Poss; Laura K Reed; Andrew Storfer; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.