Literature DB >> 17989248

Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Peter Andolfatto1.   

Abstract

Several recent studies have estimated that a large fraction of amino acid divergence between species of Drosophila was fixed by positive selection, using statistical approaches based on the McDonald-Kreitman test. However, little is known about associated selection coefficients of beneficial amino acid mutations. Recurrent selective sweeps associated with adaptive substitutions should leave a characteristic signature in genome variability data that contains information about the frequency and strength of selection. Here, I document a significant negative correlation between the level and the frequency of synonymous site polymorphism and the rate of protein evolution in highly recombining regions of the X chromosome of D. melanogaster. This pattern is predicted by recurrent adaptive protein evolution and suggests that adaptation is an important determinant of patterns of neutral variation genome-wide. Using a maximum likelihood approach, I estimate the product of the rate and strength of selection under a recurrent genetic hitchhiking model, lambda2N(e)s approximately 3 x 10(-8). Using an approach based on the McDonald-Kreitman test, I estimate that approximately 50% of divergent amino acids were driven to fixation by positive selection, implying that beneficial amino acid substitutions are of weak effect on average, on the order of 10(-5) (i.e., 2N(e)s approximately 40). Two implications of these results are that most adaptive substitutions will be difficult to detect in genome scans of selection and that population size (and genetic drift) may be an important determinant of the evolutionary dynamics of protein adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17989248      PMCID: PMC2099584          DOI: 10.1101/gr.6691007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  70 in total

1.  Allele frequency distribution under recurrent selective sweeps.

Authors:  Yuseob Kim
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The signature of positive selection on standing genetic variation.

Authors:  Molly Przeworski; Graham Coop; Jeffrey D Wall
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps?

Authors:  Kosuke M Teshima; Graham Coop; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila.

Authors:  Cathy Haag-Liautard; Mark Dorris; Xulio Maside; Steven Macaskill; Daniel L Halligan; David Houle; Brian Charlesworth; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Adaptations to fluctuating selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ville Mustonen; Michael Lässig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Extensive introgression of mitochondrial DNA relative to nuclear genes in the Drosophila yakuba species group.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog; Kevin Thornton; Andrew Clark; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Estimating the genomewide rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  John J Welch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons.

Authors:  D C Shields; P M Sharp; D G Higgins; F Wright
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 9.  The genomic rate of adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Reduced efficacy of selection in regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over.

Authors:  Penelope R Haddrill; Daniel L Halligan; Dimitris Tomaras; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  103 in total

Review 1.  Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Charles H Langley; Kristian Stevens; Charis Cardeno; Yuh Chwen G Lee; Daniel R Schrider; John E Pool; Sasha A Langley; Charlyn Suarez; Russell B Corbett-Detig; Bryan Kolaczkowski; Shu Fang; Phillip M Nista; Alisha K Holloway; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Yun S Song; Matthew W Hahn; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Patterns of neutral diversity under general models of selective sweeps.

Authors:  Graham Coop; Peter Ralph
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Searching for footprints of positive selection in whole-genome SNP data from nonequilibrium populations.

Authors:  Pavlos Pavlidis; Jeffrey D Jensen; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Integrating evolutionary and functional approaches to infer adaptation at specific loci.

Authors:  Jay F Storz; Christopher W Wheat
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  A Coalescent Model for a Sweep of a Unique Standing Variant.

Authors:  Jeremy J Berg; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Evidence for widespread positive and purifying selection across the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) genome.

Authors:  Miguel Carneiro; Frank W Albert; José Melo-Ferreira; Nicolas Galtier; Philippe Gayral; Jose A Blanco-Aguiar; Rafael Villafuerte; Michael W Nachman; Nuno Ferrand
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 8.  Fundamental concepts in genetics: effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Recombination yet inefficient selection along the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup's fourth chromosome.

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Yue Zhang; Tomoyuki Kado; Chuanzhu Fan; Ruoping Zhao; Hideki Innan; Wen Wang; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Gene genealogies strongly distorted by weakly interfering mutations in constant environments.

Authors:  Jon Seger; Wendy A Smith; Jarom J Perry; Jessalynn Hunn; Zofia A Kaliszewska; Luciano La Sala; Luciana Pozzi; Victoria J Rowntree; Frederick R Adler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.