Literature DB >> 20004669

Lineage-specific differences in the amino acid substitution process.

Snehalata Huzurbazar1, Grigory Kolesov, Steven E Massey, Katherine C Harris, Alexander Churbanov, David A Liberles.   

Abstract

In Darwinian evolution, mutations occur approximately at random in a gene, turned into amino acid mutations by the genetic code. Some mutations are fixed to become substitutions and some are eliminated from the population. Partitioning pairs of closely related species with complete genome sequences by average population size of each pair, we looked at the substitution matrices generated for these partitions and compared the substitution patterns between species. We estimated a population genetic model that relates the relative fixation probabilities of different types of mutations to the selective pressure and population size. Parameterizations of the average and distribution of selective pressures for different amino acid substitution types in different population size comparisons were generated with a Bayesian framework. We found that partitions in population size as well as in substitution type are required to explain the substitution data. Selection coefficients were found to decrease with increasingly radical amino acid substitution and with increasing effective population size. To further explore the role of underlying processes in amino acid substitution, we analyzed embryophyte (plant) gene families from TAED (The Adaptive Evolution Database), where solved structures for at least one member exist in the Protein Data Bank. Using PAML, we assigned branches to three categories: strong negative selection, moderate negative selection/neutrality, and positive diversifying selection. Focusing on the first and third categories, we identified sites changing along gene family lineages and observed the spatial patterns of substitution. Selective sweeps were expected to create primary sequence clustering under positive diversifying selection. Co-evolution through direct physical interaction was expected to cause tertiary structural clustering. Under both positive and negative selection, the substitution patterns were found to be nonrandom. Under positive diversifying selection, significant independent signals were found for primary and tertiary sequence clustering, suggesting roles for both selective sweeps and direct physical interaction. Under strong negative selection, the signals were not found to be independent. All together, a complex interplay of population genetic and protein thermodynamics forces is suggested. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20004669      PMCID: PMC2850115          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  55 in total

1.  Estimating the distribution of selection coefficients from phylogenetic data with applications to mitochondrial and viral DNA.

Authors:  Rasmus Nielsen; Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  The origins of genome complexity.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; John S Conery
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Quantifying the slightly deleterious mutation model of molecular evolution.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker; Peter D Keightley; Nick G C Smith; Daniel Gaffney
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Modeling the site-specific variation of selection patterns along lineages.

Authors:  Stéphane Guindon; Allen G Rodrigo; Kelly A Dyer; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Estimating absolute rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution in order to characterize natural selection and date species divergences.

Authors:  Tae-Kun Seo; Hirohisa Kishino; Jeffrey L Thorne
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence--a study of structural response in protein cores.

Authors:  Kristoffer Illergård; David H Ardell; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-11-15

7.  Evolutionary processes and evolutionary noise at the molecular level. I. Functional density in proteins.

Authors:  E Zuckerkandl
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1976-04-09       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution.

Authors:  R Grantham
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Detecting clusters of mutations.

Authors:  Tong Zhou; Peter J Enyeart; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The interface of protein structure, protein biophysics, and molecular evolution.

Authors:  David A Liberles; Sarah A Teichmann; Ivet Bahar; Ugo Bastolla; Jesse Bloom; Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Lucy J Colwell; A P Jason de Koning; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Julian Echave; Arne Elofsson; Dietlind L Gerloff; Richard A Goldstein; Johan A Grahnen; Mark T Holder; Clemens Lakner; Nicholas Lartillot; Simon C Lovell; Gavin Naylor; Tina Perica; David D Pollock; Tal Pupko; Lynne Regan; Andrew Roger; Nimrod Rubinstein; Eugene Shakhnovich; Kimmen Sjölander; Shamil Sunyaev; Ashley I Teufel; Jeffrey L Thorne; Joseph W Thornton; Daniel M Weinreich; Simon Whelan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  A nonadaptive origin of a beneficial trait: in silico selection for free energy of folding leads to the neutral emergence of mutational robustness in single domain proteins.

Authors:  Rafael F Pagan; Steven E Massey
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Fast side chain replacement in proteins using a coarse-grained approach for evaluating the effects of mutation during evolution.

Authors:  Johan A Grahnen; Jan Kubelka; David A Liberles
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Molecular evolution of the transmembrane domains of G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Sarosh N Fatakia; Stefano Costanzi; Carson C Chow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Development of a Monoclonal Antibody Specific to the IgM Heavy Chain of Bighead Catfish (Clarias macrocephalus): A Biomolecular Tool for the Detection and Quantification of IgM Molecules and IgM+ Cells in Clarias Catfish.

Authors:  Anurak Bunnoy; Uthairat Na-Nakorn; Prapansak Srisapoome
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-04-07

6.  Palmitoylation of Metazoan Carotenoid Oxygenases.

Authors:  Sheetal Uppal; Igor B Rogozin; T Michael Redmond; Eugenia Poliakov
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.