Literature DB >> 1739867

Discriminatory ability of bone mass measurements (SPA and DEXA) for fractures in elderly postmenopausal women.

K Overgaard1, M A Hansen, B J Riis, C Christiansen.   

Abstract

We investigated the discriminatory ability of forearm bone mineral content (BMCarm) measured by single photon absorptiometry (SPA) and spinal bone mineral density (BMDspine) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in 387 elderly postmenopausal women. Of these, 22 had never sustained a fracture (normal), 91 had had less than three vertebral wedge fractures (mild), 51 had experienced a peripheral fracture (moderate), and 24 had had more than three vertebral wedge or compression fractures (severe). BMCarm exceeded BMDspine slightly in the ability to discriminate the mild and moderate groups (P less than 0.01-0.001), whether calculations were performed on raw values or the Z-scores compared with premenopausal women. Receiver operating (ROC) analysis showed that at every cutoff level BMCarm had a similar ability as BMDspine to discriminate between the vertebral fracture (mild and severe) groups and healthy premenopausal and nonfractured postmenopausal women (normal), whereas BMCarm had a significantly higher discriminatory ability of peripheral fractures (P less than 0.05) (moderate) group compared with premenopausal women. We conclude that SPA and DEXA are equally capable as diagnostic procedures in women with established osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1739867     DOI: 10.1007/bf00297294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  50 in total

1.  Noninvasive axial and peripheral assessment of bone mineral content: a comparison between osteoporotic women and normal subjects.

Authors:  F N Van Berkum; J C Birkenhäger; L C Van Veen; J Zeelenberg; D H Birkenhäger-Frenkel; W T Trouerbach; T Stijnen; H A Pols
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-01-26       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M L Brown; R L Morin; B L Riggs
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Mild versus definite osteoporosis: comparison of bone densitometry techniques using different statistical models.

Authors:  A F Heuck; J Block; C C Glueer; P Steiger; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Limitations of forearm bone densitometry as an index of vertebral or femoral neck osteopenia.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl; B G Wren
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  C E Cann; H K Genant; F O Kolb; B Ettinger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Dual energy radiography versus quantitative computer tomography for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; M Griffin; A Chines; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of bone mineral density.

Authors:  C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Volumetric bone mineral density using peripheral quantitative computed tomography in Japanese women.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; K Kushida; K Yamazaki; T Inoue
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.

Authors:  F W Lafferty; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Comparison of bone densitometry of the phalanges, distal forearm and axial skeleton in early postmenopausal women participating in the EPIC Study.

Authors:  P Ravn; K Overgaard; C Huang; P D Ross; D Green; M McClung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Geometric variables from DXA of the radius predict forearm fracture load in vitro.

Authors:  E R Myers; A T Hecker; D S Rooks; J A Hipp; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Vertebral deformity, bone mineral density, back pain and height loss in unscreened women over 50 years.

Authors:  P H Nicholson; M J Haddaway; M W Davie; S F Evans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Interpretation of lumbar spine densitometry in women with fractures.

Authors:  S P Nielsen; F Hermansen; O Bärenholdt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  When bone mass fails to predict bone failure.

Authors:  S M Ott
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Overestimation of osteopenia using standard analysis software for peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Lehmann; H M Kvasnicka; M Wapniarz; K Klein; B Allolio
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1993-08

10.  The impact of degenerative conditions in the spine on bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction.

Authors:  P von der Recke; M A Hansen; K Overgaard; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.