Literature DB >> 6699720

Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.

R B Mazess, W W Peppler, R W Chesney, T A Lange, U Lindgren, E Smith.   

Abstract

Single-photon (I-125) absorptiometry was used to measure bone mineral content (BMC) of the distal third of the radius, and dual-photon absorptiometry (Gd-153) was used to measure total-body bone mineral (TBBM), as well as the BMC of major skeletal regions. Measurements were done in normal females, normal males, osteoporotic females, osteoporotic males, and renal patients. The BMC of the radius predicted TBBM well in normal subjects, but was less satisfactory in the patient groups. The spinal BMC was predicted with even lower accuracy from radius measurement. The error in predicting areal density (bone mass per unit projected skeletal area) of the lumbar and thoracic spine from the radius BMC divided by its width was smaller, but the regressions differed significantly among normals, osteoporotics, and renal patients. There was a preferential spinal osteopenia in the osteoporotic group and in about half of the renal patients. Bone measurements on the radius can indicate overall skeletal status in normal subjects and to a lesser degree in patients, but these radius measurements are inaccurate, even on the average, as an indicator of spinal state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6699720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  30 in total

1.  Comparison between radial bone mineral density measured by single photon absorptiometry and histomorphometric bone mass parameters measured on iliac crest biopsies.

Authors:  F Duboeuf; D Uebelhart; G Boivin; C Edouard; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Advances in noninvasive bone measurement.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H Barden; J Vetter; M Ettinger
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Impact of bone mineral measurements on osteoporosis.

Authors:  I Fogelman; A Rodin; G Blake
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

4.  Development and application of an instrument for analysis of bone structure on radiographs.

Authors:  S Xu; S Liu; K Bao
Journal:  J Tongji Med Univ       Date:  1997

5.  Which bone to measure?

Authors:  A G Need; B E Nordin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comparison of trabecular bone density at vertebral and radial sites using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Y Fujii; T Chikawa; T Nakamura; B Goto; T Fujita
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The reproducibility of single photon absorptiometry in a clinical setting.

Authors:  R Valkema; J A Blokland; S E Papapoulos; O L Bijvoet; E K Pauwels
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1989

Review 8.  Bone density measurements.

Authors:  E M Alhava
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Distal radius fracture is an early sign of general osteoporosis: bone mass measurements in a population-based study.

Authors:  H Mallmin; S Ljunghall
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Influence of patient's weight on dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density.

Authors:  P Martin; M Verhas; C Als; L Geerts; J Paternot; P Bergmann
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.