Literature DB >> 2816513

Noninvasive axial and peripheral assessment of bone mineral content: a comparison between osteoporotic women and normal subjects.

F N Van Berkum1, J C Birkenhäger, L C Van Veen, J Zeelenberg, D H Birkenhäger-Frenkel, W T Trouerbach, T Stijnen, H A Pols.   

Abstract

We compared different methods of bone densitometry in women with spinal osteoporosis and normal subjects to assess their discriminatory capability. The methods used included: quantitative computed tomography of the spine (QCT) specified as to trabecular (QCTtrab) and cortical bone (QCTcort), dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine (DPAspine), single-photon absorptiometry of the distal and proximal forearm (SPAdist and SPAprox), and quantitative roentgen microdensitometry of the phalanx (QMD). A total of 25 postmenopausal osteoporotic women and 24 healthy comparison subjects matched for age and years since menopause were studied. In the osteoporotic group an average decrement of the axial bone mineral density of -50% (p less than 0.001) and -20% (p less than 0.001) were observed for QCTtrab and QCTcort, respectively. For DPAspine, SPAdist, SPAprox, and QMD the difference between normal and osteoporotic subjects was -20% (p less than 0.001), -12% (p less than 0.05), -7% (NS), and -6% (NS), respectively. With the peripheral measurements (SPA and QMD), alone or in combination, no adequate discrimination between women with or without vertebral compression fractures could be obtained. Although QCTtrab showed the highest diagnostic sensitivity (81%), it appears not to be superior to DPAspine. Combinations of the various axial and peripheral measurements did not result in an essentially better sensitivity. In normal women as well as in osteoporotic individuals the trabecular and cortical QCT measurements showed two opposite trends, suggesting an increase in cortical and a decrease in trabecular density from L1 to L3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2816513     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650040506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  10 in total

1.  Compact and trabecular components of the spine using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  T Sandor; D Felsenberg; W A Kalender; A Clain; E Brown
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Bone densitometry of excised vertebrae; anatomical relationships.

Authors:  R B Mazess; P Pedersen; J Vetter; H S Barden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Which bone to measure?

Authors:  A G Need; B E Nordin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Bone densitometry: current assessment.

Authors:  H K Genant; K G Faulkner; C C Glüer; K Engelke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Age-dependence of bone material quality shown by the measurement of frequency of resonance in the ulna.

Authors:  P Kann; S Graeben; J Beyer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  When bone mass fails to predict bone failure.

Authors:  S M Ott
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  Perspective on post-menopausal osteoporosis: establishing an interdisciplinary understanding of the sequence of events from the molecular level to whole bone fractures.

Authors:  L M McNamara
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Discriminatory ability of bone mass measurements (SPA and DEXA) for fractures in elderly postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K Overgaard; M A Hansen; B J Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: the Rotterdam Elderly Study.

Authors:  A Hofman; D E Grobbee; P T de Jong; F A van den Ouweland
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Quantitative CT assessment of bone mineral density in dogs with hyperadrenocorticism.

Authors:  Donghoon Lee; Youngjae Lee; Wooshin Choi; Jinhwa Chang; Ji-Houn Kang; Ki-Jeong Na; Dong-Woo Chang
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.672

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.