Literature DB >> 8845599

The impact of degenerative conditions in the spine on bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction.

P von der Recke1, M A Hansen, K Overgaard, C Christiansen.   

Abstract

We examined the impact of degenerative conditions in the spine (osteophytosis and endplate sclerosis) and aortic calcification in the lumbar region on bone mineral content/density (BMC/BMD) measured in the spine and forearm by absorptiometry and on fracture risk prediction. The radiographs of 387 healthy postmenopausal women, aged 68-72 years, were assessed in masked fashion for the presence of osteophytosis, endplate sclerosis and aortic calcification in the region from L2 to L4. Vertebral deformities/fractures were assessed by different definitions. Osteophytes larger than 3 mm and in numbers of 3 or more resulted in a significantly (12%) higher spinal bone mass (p < 0.001). Endplate sclerosis had a similar effect (p < 0.001). In subjects with both degenerative conditions the BMC/BMD in the spine and forearm were significantly higher than in unaffected women (19% in the spine, 10% in the forearm; p < 0.001). The spinal BMD values were significantly lower in fractured women if both degenerative conditions were absent (p < 0.001), whereas fractured and unfractured women had similar values if degenerative conditions were present. Degenerative conditions did not alter the ability of forearm BMC to discriminate vertebral or peripheral fractures. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (true positive fraction versus false positive fraction) were generated for BMD of the lumbar spine and BMC of the forearm with regard to the discrimination between women with vertebral and peripheral fractures and healthy premenopausal women. The ROC curves for women without degenerative conditions were consistently above the curves for women affected by osteophytosis and endplate sclerosis in the lumbar spine (p < 0.001). In conclusion, osteophytes and endplate sclerosis have a considerable influence on spinal bone mass measurements in elderly postmenopausal women and affect the diagnostic ability of spinal scans to discriminate osteoporotic women. Our data suggest that in elderly women, unless the spine is radiologically clear of degenerative conditions, a peripheral measurement procedure should be considered an alternative for assessment of bone mineral content/density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8845599     DOI: 10.1007/bf01626537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  23 in total

1.  The effect of overlying calcification on lumbar bone densitometry.

Authors:  P J Drinka; A A DeSmet; S F Bauwens; A Rogot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  The relationship between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J Dequeker
Journal:  Clin Rheum Dis       Date:  1985-08

4.  Primer on certain elements of medical decision making.

Authors:  B J McNeil; E Keller; S J Adelstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Comparison of single- and dual-photon absorptiometry in postmenopausal bone mineral loss.

Authors:  L Nilas; J Borg; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Physical and histomorphological characteristics of iliac crest bone differ according to the grade of osteoarthritis at the hand.

Authors:  G Gevers; J Dequeker; P Geusens; C Nyssen-Behets; A Dhem
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Sensitivity of dual-photon absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  J M Pouilles; F Tremollieres; J P Louvet; B Fournie; G Morlock; C Ribot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Discriminative ability of total body bone-mineral measured by dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  A Gotfredsen; J Pødenphant; L Nilas; C Christiansen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.713

10.  Effect of spinal osteophytosis on bone mineral density measurements in vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  T Masud; S Langley; P Wiltshire; D V Doyle; T D Spector
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-17
View more
  17 in total

1.  Additive association of vitamin D insufficiency and sarcopenia with low femoral bone mineral density in noninstitutionalized elderly population: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2009-2010.

Authors:  S-G Lee; Y-h Lee; K J Kim; W Lee; O H Kwon; J-H Kim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Developing a policy on osteoporosis. Dual energy x ray absorptiometry may not be the gold standard.

Authors:  C R Paterson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-11

3.  Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Scientific Advisory Board, Osteoporosis Society of Canada.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  A European multicenter comparison of quantitative ultrasound measurement variables: the OPUS study.

Authors:  M A Paggiosi; R Barkmann; C C Glüer; C Roux; D M Reid; D Felsenberg; M Bradburn; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Bone mineral density and estimated height loss based on patients' recalls.

Authors:  A Moayyeri; S Ahmadi-Abhari; A Hossein-nezhad; B Larijani; A Soltani
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Positioner and clothing artifact can affect one-third radius bone mineral density measurement.

Authors:  Diane Krueger; Nellie Vallarta-Ast; Jessie Libber; Mary Checovich; Ronald Gangnon; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Bone status in rheumatoid arthritis assessed at peripheral sites by three different quantitative ultrasound devices.

Authors:  O R Madsen; C Suetta; C Egsmose; J S Lorentzen; O H Sørensen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Positive relationship between bone mineral density and low back pain in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Takashi Manabe; Shin-ichiro Takasugi; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Biomechanics of the aging spine.

Authors:  Stephen J Ferguson; Thomas Steffen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Effect of dexrazoxane and amifostine on the vertebral bone quality of Doxorubicin treated male rats.

Authors:  F Mwale; G Marguier; J A Ouellet; A Petit; L M Epure; J Antoniou; L E Chalifour
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.