Literature DB >> 8219652

Overestimation of osteopenia using standard analysis software for peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

R Lehmann1, H M Kvasnicka, M Wapniarz, K Klein, B Allolio.   

Abstract

It is well established that measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) can estimate the risk of future fractures. To assess individual fracture risk BMD measurements are compared with a reference range provided by the manufacturer of the respective BMD technology. However, the power of trabecular bone measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to predict future fractures has not been shown up to now. We conducted measurements of trabecular bone density (TBD) at the distal radius (pQCT XCT 900, Stratec, Germany) in a sample of 506 healthy white women aged 40-60 years (mean 48) and compared the results with the manufacturer's normal range. We found a remarkable difference in TBD values between our healthy study population and the manufacturer's reference data in all age groups (e.g., age 50-54 years, 143.1 +/- 43.2 mg/cm3 versus 181.1 +/- 39.0 mg/cm3). Compared to the +/- 2 SD limits of the manufacturer's reference range our study population showed mean TBD values that were about 1 SD below the mean of the reference range. About 50% of our healthy cohort were below the -1 SD limit of the reference range. Almost ten times as many normal subjects as expected (22.1%) were found below the -2 SD limit and therefore classified as individuals with increased fracture risk. This overestimation of fracture risk leads to discomfort of the patient, unnecessary therapeutic intervention, and significant costs to the public.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8219652     DOI: 10.1007/bf00184482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Investig        ISSN: 0941-0198


  13 in total

Review 1.  Interpretation of bone densitometry measurements: disadvantages of a percentage scale and a discussion of some alternatives.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Clinical use of bone densitometry.

Authors:  C C Johnston; C W Slemenda; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  [Reproducibility of bone density measurements of the distal radius using a high resolution special scanner for peripheral quantitative computed tomography (Single Energy PQCT)].

Authors:  R Lehmann; M Wapniarz; H M Kvasnicka; S Baedeker; K Klein; B Allolio
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Effects of age and sex on bone density at the hip and spine in a normal Caucasian New Zealand population.

Authors:  J R Elliott; N L Gilchrist; J E Wells; J G Turner; E Ayling; W J Gillespie; R Sainsbury; A Hornblow; R A Donald
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1990-02-14

5.  Selection of the optimal skeletal site for fracture risk prediction.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; L K Heilbrun; J M Vogel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The predictive value of forearm bone mineral content measurements in men.

Authors:  P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Predicting fractures in women by using forearm bone densitometry.

Authors:  P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Discriminatory ability of bone mass measurements (SPA and DEXA) for fractures in elderly postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K Overgaard; M A Hansen; B J Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Bone mass in an urban and a rural population: a comparative, population-based study in southern Sweden.

Authors:  P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson; I Sernbo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  2 in total

1.  Forearm BMD as measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in a German reference population.

Authors:  S Butz; C Wüster; C Scheidt-Nave; M Götz; R Ziegler
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Prevalence of osteoporosis and reference data for lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density in a Korean population.

Authors:  Lian-Hua Cui; Jin-Su Choi; Min-Ho Shin; Sun-Seog Kweon; Kyeong-Soo Park; Young-Hoon Lee; Hae-Sung Nam; Seul-Ki Jeong; Jeong-Soo Im
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 2.626

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.