Literature DB >> 8883120

Comparison of bone densitometry of the phalanges, distal forearm and axial skeleton in early postmenopausal women participating in the EPIC Study.

P Ravn1, K Overgaard, C Huang, P D Ross, D Green, M McClung.   

Abstract

We present baseline bone densitometry from the Early Postmenopausal Interventional Cohort study (EPIC, sponsored by Merck, Sharp &amp; Dohme) for the first time, in which 1609 women from England, Oregon, Hawaii and Denmark are participating to investigate the efficacy of daily oral alendronate to prevent early postmenopausal bone loss. We compared radiographic absorptiometry (RA) of the phalanges for bone mineral density (BMD) measurement with single-energy X-ray absorptiometry (SXA) of the distal forearm, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine, proximal femur and distal forearm. In a random subgroup of 308 women, aged 45-60 years, on average 6 years since menopause (YSM), bone densitometry was measured once at baseline by RA of the phalanges besides the mandatory measurements by DXA. Bone densitometry was furthermore measured by SXA at the Danish site (89 women). Sixty-eight of the women had duplicate measurements performed within 1-3 weeks to evaluate the short-term precision error (CV%). One hundred and one healthy premenopausal women, aged 25-48 years, were recruited at the Danish and Hawaiian sites to establish a reference group. The precision error was 1.5% for RA of the phalanges and in the range 1.0-2.2% for SXA and DXA. BMD by RA correlated with BMD measured by SXA and DXA in the range 0.45 < r < 0.72 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, bone densitometry by RA of the phalanges is highly correlated with bone densitometry by SXA and DXA. RA of the phalanges has a short-term precision error comparable to that of SXA and DXA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8883120     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  31 in total

1.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach.

Authors:  E BARNETT; B E NORDIN
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Bone mass measured by photon absorptiometry: comparison of forearm, heel, and spine.

Authors:  M A Hansen; B J Riis; K Overgaard; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.713

3.  Radiographic absorptiometry: a simple method for determination of bone mass.

Authors:  F Cosman; B Herrington; S Himmelstein; R Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Photodensitometry of bone roentgenograms with an on-line computer.

Authors:  C Colbert; C Garrett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1969 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Bone composition in the distal forearm.

Authors:  L Nilas; H Nørgaard; J Pødenphant; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.713

6.  Radiographic absorptiometry for bone mineral measurement of the phalanges: precision and accuracy study.

Authors:  S O Yang; S Hagiwara; K Engelke; M S Dhillon; G Guglielmi; E J Bendavid; O Soejima; D L Nelson; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A cross-sectional study of age-related loss of mineral content of phalangeal bone in men and women.

Authors:  W T Trouerbach; J C Birkenhäger; P I Schmitz; A M van Hemert; J L van Saase; H J Collette; A W Zwamborn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Limitations of forearm bone densitometry as an index of vertebral or femoral neck osteopenia.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl; B G Wren
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  5 in total

1.  Radiographic absorptiometry for measuring bone mass.

Authors:  P D Ross
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Computed digital absorptiometry for measurement of phalangeal bone mineral mass on a slot-scanning digital radiography system.

Authors:  R Dendere; S P Whiley; T S Douglas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Robert G Josse
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study.

Authors:  Lisa Forsén; Gro K Rosvold Berntsen; Haakon E Meyer; Grethe S Tell; Vinjar Fønnebø
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Comparison of radiogrammetrical metacarpal indices in children and reference data from the First Zurich Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  David D Martin; Conrad Heckmann; Julia Neuhof; Oskar G Jenni; Michael B Ranke; Gerhard Binder
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.