Literature DB >> 17390122

[Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip].

M Rudert1, L Gerdesmeyer, H Rechl, P Juhnke, R Gradinger.   

Abstract

Resurfacing arthroplasty is regarded as an attractive method, especially for the young patient who needs a hip replacement. However, the high expectations regarding this new technique in THR must first be met. Earlier experiences with similar forms of surface replacement have led to high revision rates with early aseptic wear induced component loosening and neck fractures. Technical progresses in production techniques for metal-on-metal articulations with minimized wear have enabled the introduction of new surface replacements for the hip joint. Long-term results of these resurfacing arthroplasties are still due. Femoral neck fractures and femoro-acetabular impingement are possible early complications which require revision. The implantation of these systems requires a high degree of operative skill and experience on the part of the surgeon. Approach dependent trauma to the musculature and endangering of the blood supply to the femoral head is balanced with the positive effect of the preservation of femoral bone stock and better options in case of revision. Whether the younger patient with a higher activity profile and an increased chance of implant loosening actually profits from the resurfacing arthroplasty will be determined in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17390122     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1076-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  29 in total

1.  The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements.

Authors:  S L Smith; D Dowson; A A Goldsmith
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Biomechanical, morphological, and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  M M Morlock; N Bishop; W Rüther; G Delling; M Hahn
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a comparison with hybrid total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J M Loughead; I Starks; D Chesney; J N S Matthews; A W McCaskie; J P Holland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-01

4.  Experience with the Metasul total hip bearing system.

Authors:  B G Weber
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Phillip S Ragland; Gracia Etienne; Thorsten M Seyler; Thomas P Schmalzried
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 6.  The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter Grigoris; Paul Roberts; Kostantinos Panousis; Hendrik Bosch
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis.

Authors:  D McMinn; R Treacy; K Lin; P Pynsent
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  H Wagner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Paul E Beaulé; Frederick J Dorey; Michel J Le Duff; Pat A Campbell; Thomas A Gruen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J Daniel; P B Pynsent; D J W McMinn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-03
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Surgical approaches in hip resurfacing].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; H Gollwitzer; R Bader; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  The minimally invasive anterolateral approach combined with hip onlay resurfacing.

Authors:  Ludger Gerdesmeyer; Hans Gollwitzer; Peter Diehl; Björn Buttgereit; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  [Reasons for failure of hip resurfacing implants. A failure analysis based on 250 revision specimens].

Authors:  M M Morlock; N Bishop; F Stahmer; J Zustin; G Sauter; M Hahn; M Krause; W Rüther; M Amling
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Approach to painful hip resurfacing].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; H Gollwitzer; P Diehl; M Fuerst; M Schmitt-Sody
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  [Biomechanical aspects of the implant fixation and kinematics of hip resurfacing systems].

Authors:  R Bader; D Klüss; L Gerdesmeyer; E Steinhauser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  [Uncemented arthroplasty of the hip].

Authors:  C von Schulze Pellengahr; A Fottner; S Utzschneider; M Schmitt-Sody; W Teske; T Lichtinger; S A Esenwein
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.087

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.