Literature DB >> 15833450

The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Peter Grigoris1, Paul Roberts, Kostantinos Panousis, Hendrik Bosch.   

Abstract

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing, a significant recent development in hip arthroplasty, preserves proximal femoral bone stock, optimizes stress transfer to the proximal femur, and offers inherent stability and optimal range of movement. The results of hip resurfacing in the 1970s and 1980s were disappointing, and the procedure was largely abandoned by the mid-1980s. The renaissance of metal-on-metal articulations for total hip arthroplasty has enabled the introduction of new hip resurfacings, and many implant manufacturers have introduced such systems. Early results are encouraging, and complications commonly seen in the 1970s and 1980s, such as early implant loosening and femoral neck fracture, are rare. Background research and better understanding of implant failure suggest that current hip resurfacing technology has developed beyond that of an experimental procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15833450     DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  13 in total

1.  [Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip].

Authors:  M Rudert; L Gerdesmeyer; H Rechl; P Juhnke; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Wadih Y Matar; Philippe Poitras; Kevin Smit; Olivier May
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Neck narrowing in resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a vascular insult?

Authors:  S A Brennan; F Khan; J McQuillan; C J O'Neill; P Kenny; S K O'Rourke; J M O'Byrne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  What is the midterm survivorship and function after hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Luthfur Rahman; Sarah K Muirhead-Allwood; Muhannad Alkinj
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Heterotopic bone formation following resurfacing total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Merrill A Ritter; Matthew Galley
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-04-21

6.  Whole-mount specimens in the analysis of en bloc samples obtained from revisions of resurfacing hip implants. A report of 4 early failures.

Authors:  Ioannis Stogiannidis; Timo Puolakka; Jorma Pajamäki; Teemu Moilanen; Yrjö T Konttinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Does femoral neck to cup impingement affect metal ion levels in hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Michel J Le Duff; Alicia J Johnson; Andrew J Wassef; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Total hip arthroplasty in advanced osteonecrosis: the short-term results by metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Firooz Madadi; Alireza Eajazi; Seyyed Morteza Kazemi; Armin Aalami Harandi; Firoozeh Madadi; Seyyed Reza Sharifzadeh
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-02

10.  Center of Mass Compensation during Gait in Hip Arthroplasty Patients: Comparison between Large Diameter Head Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing.

Authors:  Vicky Bouffard; Julie Nantel; Marc Therrien; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Martin Lavigne; François Prince
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2011-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.