Literature DB >> 11382075

The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements.

S L Smith1, D Dowson, A A Goldsmith.   

Abstract

It has been found that a remarkable reduction in the wear of metal-on-metal hip joints can be achieved by simply increasing the diameter of the joint. A tribological evaluation of metal-on-metal joints of 16, 22.225, 28 and 36 mm diameter was conducted in 25 per cent bovine serum using a hip joint simulator. The joints were subject to dynamic motion and loading cycles simulating walking for both lubrication and wear studies. For each size of joint in the lubrication study, an electrical resistivity technique was used to detect the extent of surface separation through a complete walking cycle. Wear of each size of joint was measured gravimetrically in wear tests of at least 2 x 10(6) cycles duration. Joints of 16 and 22.225 mm diameter showed no surface separation in the lubrication study. This suggested that wear would be proportional to the sliding distance and hence joint size in this boundary lubrication regime. A 28 mm diameter joint showed only limited evidence of surface separation suggesting that these joints were operating in a mixed lubrication regime. A 36 mm diameter joint showed surface separation for considerable parts of each walking cycle and hence evidence of the formation of a protective lubricating film. Wear testing of 16 and 22.225 mm diameter metal-on-metal joints gave mean wear rates of 4.85 and 6.30 mm3/10(6) cycles respectively. The ratio of these wear rates, 0.77, is approximately the same as the joint diameters ratio, 16/22.225 or 0.72, as expected from simple wear theory for dry or boundary lubrication conditions. No bedding-in was observed with these smaller diameter joints. For the 28 mm diameter joint, from 0 to 2 x 10(6) cycles, the mean wear rate was 1.62 mm3/10(6) cycles as the joints bedded-in. Following bedding-in, from 2.0 x 10(6) to 4.7 x 10(6) cycles, the wear rate was 0.54 mm3/10(6) cycles. As reported previously by Goldsmith et al. in 2000 [1], the mean steady state wear rate of the 36 mm diameter joints was lower than those of all the other diameters at 0.07 mm3/10(6) cycles. For a range of joints of various diameters, subjected to identical test conditions, mean wear rates differed by almost two orders of magnitude. This study has demonstrated that the application of sound tribological principles to prosthetic design can reduce the wear of metal-on-metal joints, using currently available materials, to a negligible level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11382075     DOI: 10.1243/0954411011533724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  22 in total

1.  [Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip].

Authors:  M Rudert; L Gerdesmeyer; H Rechl; P Juhnke; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  The Hard on Hard Bearings in THA - Current concepts.

Authors:  P Gopinathan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-09-19

3.  Do ion levels in hip resurfacing differ from metal-on-metal THA at midterm?

Authors:  A Moroni; L Savarino; M Hoque; M Cadossi; N Baldini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  What are the risks accompanying the reduced wear benefit of low-clearance hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Joseph Daniel; Hena Ziaee; Amir Kamali; Chandra Pradhan; Derek McMinn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Femoral head size does not affect ion values in metal-on-metal total hips.

Authors:  Mitchell Bernstein; Alan Walsh; Alain Petit; David J Zukor; Olga L Huk; John Antoniou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Are component positioning and prosthesis size associated with hip resurfacing failure?

Authors:  David R Marker; Michael G Zywiel; Aaron J Johnson; Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA?

Authors:  Nick Bayley; Habeeb Khan; Paul Grosso; Thomas Hupel; David Stevens; Matthew Snider; Emil Schemitsch; Paul Kuzyk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Does ion release differ between hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal THA?

Authors:  Antonio Moroni; Lucia Savarino; Matteo Cadossi; Nicola Baldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Review on squeaking hips.

Authors:  Yadin David Levy; Selin Munir; Shane Donohoo; William Lindsay Walter
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18

10.  CoCrMo metal-on-metal hip replacements.

Authors:  Yifeng Liao; Emily Hoffman; Markus Wimmer; Alfons Fischer; Joshua Jacobs; Laurence Marks
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.