Literature DB >> 18548229

[Surgical approaches in hip resurfacing].

L Gerdesmeyer1, H Gollwitzer, R Bader, M Rudert.   

Abstract

A large variety of approaches are described for standard total hip arthroplasty. All of them are technically based on three different approaches: anterior, anterolateral, or posterior. In recent hip resurfacing, the posterior approach is common, due to large instruments used to ream the femur. Better exposure of the acetabulum is achieved by the posterior approach, but this technique puts the important extraosseous blood supply to the femoral head at risk. The anterior approach preserves blood supply and gives better options to treat the femoroacetabular impingement. If specific surgical modifications and instruments designed for minimally invasive surgery are used, hip resurfacing can be performed with an anterolateral technique. Excellent functional and clinical outcomes have been reported after all three approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18548229     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-008-1282-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  55 in total

1.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques.

Authors:  Rodrigo Mardones; Mark W Pagnano; Joseph P Nemanich; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The course of the inferior gluteal nerve in the posterior approach to the hip.

Authors:  Z X Ling; V P Kumar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-12

3.  Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.

Authors:  Jason P Long; Donald L Bartel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Femoral component sizing and positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Philippe Poitras
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2007

5.  Muscle damage in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: MRI evidence that it is not significant.

Authors:  B Sonny Bal; Jason A Lowe
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2008

6.  Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  T R Light; K J Keggi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Resurfacing hip arthroplasty: comparison of a minimally invasive versus standard approach.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Phillip S Ragland; David Marker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Use of metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Thorsten M Seyler; David R Marker; German A Marulanda; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Minimally invasive anterolateral approach to the hip: risk to the superior gluteal nerve.

Authors:  Akif Ince; Max Kemper; Jens Waschke; Christian Hendrich
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Aditya V Maheshwari; William T Long; Zhinian Wan; Leigh Ellen Sirianni
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Postoperative complications in trauma surgery].

Authors:  C Josten; C Schmidt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The effect of surgical approach on the histologyof the femoral head following resurfacing of the hip: Analysis of retrieval specimens.

Authors:  H W Amarasekera; P C Campbell; N Parsons; J Achten; J Masters; D R Griffin; M L Costa
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.853

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.