Literature DB >> 17333588

The role of genetic counseling in the elective termination of pregnancies involving fetuses with disabilities.

Christy D Roberts1, Laura D Stough, Linda H Parrish.   

Abstract

In this study, 69 women were surveyed who, as a result of a prenatal screening knew they were at risk for carrying a fetus with a disability. Results indicated that most women were referred by their physicians for genetic counseling either because of their age or because of an abnormal blood test. The majority of women indicated they would choose to terminate a pregnancy that tested positive for a disability, but the type of disability of the fetus, either Down syndrome or spina bifida, made no difference in the decision that women believed they would make. The women's intention to terminate a pregnancy appeared to be unrelated to their overall knowledge about disabilities but was negatively related to their knowledge of disability-related services. Although women reported that genetic counseling was helpful, they revealed that they were not given information about future-quality-of-life issues for individuals with disabilities nor provided with the positive as well as the negative aspects of giving birth to a child with disabilities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 17333588     DOI: 10.1177/00224669020360010501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spec Educ        ISSN: 0022-4669


  12 in total

1.  Views on abortion: a comparison of female genetic counselors and women from the general population.

Authors:  Amelia R Woltanski; Ryan T Cragun; Melanie F Myers; Deborah L Cragun
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Prenatal testing for intellectual disability: misperceptions and reality with lessons from Down syndrome.

Authors:  Kruti Acharya
Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2011

Review 3.  The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: a commentary.

Authors:  Anne C Madeo; Barbara B Biesecker; Campbell Brasington; Lori H Erby; Kathryn F Peters
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Talking about disability in prenatal genetic counseling: a report of two interactive workshops.

Authors:  Jan Hodgson; Jon Weil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic counseling for prenatal testing: where is the discussion about disability?

Authors:  Ellyn Farrelly; Mildred K Cho; Lori Erby; Debra Roter; Anabel Stenzel; Kelly Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Attitudes of mothers of children with down syndrome towards noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Gregory Kellogg; Leah Slattery; Louanne Hudgins; Kelly Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Factors associated with the timeliness of postnatal surgical repair of spina bifida.

Authors:  Elizabeth Radcliff; Cynthia H Cassell; Sarah B Laditka; Judy K Thibadeau; Jane Correia; Scott D Grosse; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Decision-Making after Prenatal Diagnosis of down Syndrome.

Authors:  Amy R Reed; Kathryn L Berrier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Is the prevalence of Down syndrome births in Hawai'i increasing?

Authors:  Heather McDermott; Jean L Johnson
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2011-04

10.  Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  C Roadhouse; C Shuman; K Anstey; K Sappleton; D Chitayat; E Ignagni
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.