Literature DB >> 22447752

Prenatal testing for intellectual disability: misperceptions and reality with lessons from Down syndrome.

Kruti Acharya1.   

Abstract

Down syndrome is the most common cause of intellectual disability. In the United States, it is recommended that prenatal testing for Down syndrome be offered to all women. Because of this policy and consequent public perception, having Down syndrome has become a disadvantage in the prenatal period. However, in the postnatal period, there may be some advantage in having Down syndrome. To help parents make informed decisions about screening and testing, it is crucial to reconcile divergent prenatal and postnatal perspectives. Advancements in genetic technologies will also impact the informed consent process and need to be considered.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22447752      PMCID: PMC3597781          DOI: 10.1002/ddrr.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev        ISSN: 1940-5529


  41 in total

Review 1.  The epidemiology of mental retardation: challenges and opportunities in the new millennium.

Authors:  Helen Leonard; Xingyan Wen
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2002

2.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77: screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Fetal-specific DNA methylation ratio permits noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21.

Authors:  Elisavet A Papageorgiou; Alex Karagrigoriou; Evdokia Tsaliki; Voula Velissariou; Nigel P Carter; Philippos C Patsalis
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Resident physicians' competencies and attitudes in delivering a postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome.

Authors:  James E Ferguson; Harold L Kleinert; Carol A Lunney; Lynn R Campbell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Authors:  David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: synthesis of the evidence on how best to deliver the news.

Authors:  Brian G Skotko; George T Capone; Priya S Kishnani
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 7.  Ashley X.

Authors:  Kristi L Kirschner; Rebecca Brashler; Teresa A Savage
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  Divorce in families of children with Down syndrome: a population-based study.

Authors:  Richard C Urbano; Robert M Hodapp
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  2007-07

9.  Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.

Authors:  Carmen Keller; Michael Siegrist
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Trilochan Sahoo; Sau Wai Cheung; Patricia Ward; Sandra Darilek; Ankita Patel; Daniela del Gaudio; Sung Hae L Kang; Seema R Lalani; Jiangzhen Li; Sallie McAdoo; Audrey Burke; Chad A Shaw; Pawel Stankiewicz; A Craig Chinault; Ignatia B Van den Veyver; Benjamin B Roa; Arthur L Beaudet; Christine M Eng
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  3 in total

1.  Uptake of colorectal cancer screening among Ontarians with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Hélène Ouellette-Kuntz; Helen Coo; Virginie Cobigo; Andrew S Wilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Parents' Attitudes toward Clinical Genetic Testing for Autism Spectrum Disorder-Data from a Norwegian Sample.

Authors:  Jarle Johannessen; Terje Nærland; Sigrun Hope; Tonje Torske; Anne Lise Høyland; Jana Strohmaier; Arvid Heiberg; Marcella Rietschel; Srdjan Djurovic; Ole A Andreassen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Assessment of Foot Shape in Children and Adolescents with Intellectual Disability: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Andżelina Wolan-Nieroda; Agnieszka Guzik; Katarzyna Bazarnik-Mucha; Maciej Rachwał; Justyna Drzał-Grabiec; Ewa Szeliga; Katarzyna Walicka-Cupryś
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-04-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.