Literature DB >> 18836819

Views on abortion: a comparison of female genetic counselors and women from the general population.

Amelia R Woltanski1, Ryan T Cragun, Melanie F Myers, Deborah L Cragun.   

Abstract

While literature characterizing individual genetic counselors' abortion attitudes is sparse, the National Society of Genetic Counselors takes a clear stance for reproductive autonomy. To determine genetic counselors' views, this study compared (1) genetic counselors' abortion attitudes to those of women from the general population and (2) genetic counselors' professional abortion attitudes to their personal abortion attitudes. Genetic counselors were invited to complete an online survey. Response rate was 44.3% (709/1,601). Compared to women from the general population, female genetic counselors were significantly more likely to agree abortion should be an option in all cases (p < .001). Controlling for other possible confounders, regression analyses revealed that being a genetic counselor, religious service attendance and age were significantly predictive of abortion attitudes. Although the vast majority of genetic counselors agree that abortion should be available, they are significantly less likely to personally consider abortion under all circumstances presented (p < .001), and the percentage of genetic counselors who would consider terminating in the case of a severe birth defect is similar to studies of other women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18836819     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-008-9177-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  28 in total

1.  Influence of physician attitudes on willingness to perform abortion.

Authors:  A N Aiyer; G Ruiz; A Steinman; G Y Ho
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The determinants of attitudes toward abortion in the American electorate.

Authors:  Jerome S Legge
Journal:  West Polit Q       Date:  1983-09

3.  Blacks, whites, and attitudes towards abortion.

Authors:  Michael W Combs; Susan Welch
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  1982

4.  The measurement of public opinion on abortion: the effects of survey design.

Authors:  L L Bumpass
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

5.  Pregnancy termination because of chromosomal abnormalities: a study of 26,950 amniocenteses in the southeast.

Authors:  V A Vincent; J G Edwards; S R Young; M Nachtigal
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Impact of prenatal diagnosis and elective termination on the prevalence of selected birth defects in Hawaii.

Authors:  M B Forrester; R D Merz; P W Yoon
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Two measures of nurses' attitudes toward abortion as modified by experience.

Authors:  D V Allen; P A Reichelt; F P Shea
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Participants' reaction to amniocentesis and prenatal genetic studies.

Authors:  S C Finley; P D Varner; P C Vinson; W H Finley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Culture and acculturation influences on Palestinian perceptions of prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Rawan Awwad; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Prenatal genetic services for Down's syndrome: access and provision in 1990-1991. Steering Committee of the National Confidential Enquiry into Counselling for Genetic Disorders.

Authors:  P Williamson; R Harris; S Church; M Fiddler; J Rhind
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-07
View more
  3 in total

1.  The Moral Reasoning of Genetic Dilemmas Amongst Jewish Israeli Undergraduate Students with Different Religious Affiliations and Scientific Backgrounds.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genetic counselors' religiosity & spirituality: are genetic counselors different from the general population?

Authors:  Ryan T Cragun; Amelia R Woltanski; Melanie F Myers; Deborah L Cragun
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Genetic testing likelihood: the impact of abortion views and quality of life information on women's decisions.

Authors:  Jessica L Wilson; Gail M Ferguson; Judith M Thorn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.537

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.