Literature DB >> 17333534

Karyotype evolution and phylogenetic relationships of hamsters (Cricetidae, Muroidea, Rodentia) inferred from chromosomal painting and banding comparison.

Svetlana A Romanenko1, Vitaly T Volobouev, Polina L Perelman, Vladimir S Lebedev, Natalya A Serdukova, Vladimir A Trifonov, Larisa S Biltueva, Wenhui Nie, Patricia C M O'Brien, Nina Sh Bulatova, Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith, Fengtang Yang, Alexander S Graphodatsky.   

Abstract

The evolutionary success of rodents of the superfamily Muroidea makes this taxon the most interesting for evolution studies, including study at the chromosomal level. Chromosome-specific painting probes from the Chinese hamster and the Syrian (golden) hamster were used to delimit homologous chromosomal segments among 15 hamster species from eight genera: Allocricetulus, Calomyscus, Cricetulus, Cricetus, Mesocricetus, Peromyscus, Phodopus and Tscherskia (Cricetidae, Muroidea, Rodentia). Based on results of chromosome painting and G-banding, comparative maps between 20 rodent species have been established. The integrated maps demonstrate a high level of karyotype conservation among species in the Cricetus group (Cricetus, Cricetulus, Allocricetulus) with Tscherskia as its sister group. Species within the genera Mesocricetus and Phodopus also show a high degree of chromosomal conservation. Our results substantiate many of the conclusions suggested by other data and strengthen the topology of the Muroidea phylogenetic tree through the inclusion of genome-wide chromosome rearrangements. The derivation of the muroids karyotypes from the putative ancestral state involved centric fusions, fissions, addition of heterochromatic arms and a great number of inversions. Our results provide further insights into the karyotype relationships of all species investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17333534     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-007-1124-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  36 in total

1.  Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting.

Authors:  F Yang; P C O'Brien; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Phylogeny of muroid rodents: relationships within and among major lineages as determined by IRBP gene sequences.

Authors:  Sharon A Jansa; Marcelo Weksler
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps.

Authors:  William J Murphy; Denis M Larkin; Annelie Everts-van der Wind; Guillaume Bourque; Glenn Tesler; Loretta Auvil; Jonathan E Beever; Bhanu P Chowdhary; Francis Galibert; Lisa Gatzke; Christophe Hitte; Stacey N Meyers; Denis Milan; Elaine A Ostrander; Greg Pape; Heidi G Parker; Terje Raudsepp; Margarita B Rogatcheva; Lawrence B Schook; Loren C Skow; Michael Welge; James E Womack; Stephen J O'brien; Pavel A Pevzner; Harris A Lewin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Are molecular cytogenetics and bioinformatics suggesting diverging models of ancestral mammalian genomes?

Authors:  Lutz Froenicke; Montserrat Garcia Caldés; Alexander Graphodatsky; Stefan Müller; Leslie A Lyons; Terence J Robinson; Marianne Volleth; Fengtang Yang; Johannes Wienberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Phylogenomics of the genus Mus (Rodentia; Muridae): extensive genome repatterning is not restricted to the house mouse.

Authors:  Frederic Veyrunes; Gauthier Dobigny; Fengtang Yang; Patricia C M O'Brien; Josette Catalan; Terence J Robinson; Janice Britton-Davidian
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Identification of chromosome rearrangements between the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus) and the Indian spiny mouse (Mus platythrix) by comparative FISH analysis.

Authors:  Kazumi Matsubara; Chizuko Nishida-Umehara; Asato Kuroiwa; Kimiyuki Tsuchiya; Yoichi Matsuda
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Molecular phylogeny of the Cricetinae subfamily based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b and 12S rRNA genes and the nuclear vWF gene.

Authors:  Karsten Neumann; Johan Michaux; Vladimir Lebedev; Nuri Yigit; Ercument Colak; Natalia Ivanova; Andrey Poltoraus; Alexei Surov; Georgi Markov; Steffen Maak; Sabine Neumann; Rolf Gattermann
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  Phylogeny and divergence-date estimates of rapid radiations in muroid rodents based on multiple nuclear genes.

Authors:  Scott Steppan; Ronald Adkins; Joel Anderson
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  Evolution of genome organizations of squirrels (Sciuridae) revealed by cross-species chromosome painting.

Authors:  Tangliang Li; Patricia C M O'Brien; Larisa Biltueva; Beiyuan Fu; Jinhuan Wang; Wenhui Nie; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.620

10.  Highly conserved chromosomes in an Asian squirrel (Menetes berdmorei, Rodentia: Sciuridae) as demonstrated by ZOO-FISH with human probes.

Authors:  F Richard; C Messaoudi; A Bonnet-Garnier; M Lombard; B Dutrillaux
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.620

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal evolution in Rodentia.

Authors:  S A Romanenko; P L Perelman; V A Trifonov; A S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Addressing chromosome evolution in the whole-genome sequence era.

Authors:  Thomas Faraut
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Divergent patterns of breakpoint reuse in Muroid rodents.

Authors:  E E Mlynarski; C J Obergfell; M J O'Neill; R J O'Neill
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  LINE-1 distribution in six rodent genomes follow a species-specific pattern.

Authors:  A Vieira-da-Silva; F Adega; H Guedes-Pinto; R Chaves
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Reconstruction of karyotype evolution in core Glires. I. The genome homology revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Authors:  Violetta R Beklemisheva; Svetlana A Romanenko; Larisa S Biltueva; Vladimir A Trifonov; Nadezhda V Vorobieva; Natalya A Serdukova; Nadezhda V Rubtsova; Oleg V Brandler; Patricia C M O'Brien; Fentang Yang; Roscoe Stanyon; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  The genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals.

Authors:  Alexander S Graphodatsky; Vladimir A Trifonov; Roscoe Stanyon
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Praomys tullbergi (Muridae, Rodentia) genome architecture decoded by comparative chromosome painting with Mus and Rattus.

Authors:  Raquel Chaves; Sandra Louzada; Susana Meles; Johannes Wienberg; Filomena Adega
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  The puzzling character of repetitive DNA in Phodopus genomes (Cricetidae, Rodentia).

Authors:  Ana Paço; Filomena Adega; Nevenka Meštrović; Miroslav Plohl; Raquel Chaves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Chromosomal phylogeny of four Akodontini species (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from southern Brazil established by Zoo-FISH using Mus musculus (Muridae) painting probes.

Authors:  Iris Hass; Ives José Sbalqueiro; Stefan Müller
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). I. The genome homology of tundra vole, field vole, mouse and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Authors:  Natalia A Sitnikova; Svetlana A Romanenko; Patricia C M O'Brien; Polina L Perelman; Beiyuan Fu; Nadezhda V Rubtsova; Natalya A Serdukova; Feodor N Golenishchev; Vladimir A Trifonov; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.