Literature DB >> 21559983

Reconstruction of karyotype evolution in core Glires. I. The genome homology revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Violetta R Beklemisheva1, Svetlana A Romanenko, Larisa S Biltueva, Vladimir A Trifonov, Nadezhda V Vorobieva, Natalya A Serdukova, Nadezhda V Rubtsova, Oleg V Brandler, Patricia C M O'Brien, Fentang Yang, Roscoe Stanyon, Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith, Alexander S Graphodatsky.   

Abstract

Glires represent a eutherian clade consisting of rodents and lagomorphs (hares, rabbits, and pikas). Chromosome evolution of Glires is known to have variable rates in different groups: from slowly evolving lagomorphs and squirrels to extremely rapidly evolving muroids. Previous interordinal homology maps between slowly evolving Glires were based on comparison with humans. Here, we used sets of chromosome-specific probes from Tamias sibiricus (Sciuridae), Castor fiber (Castoridae) and humans to study karyotypes of six ground squirrels (genera Marmota and Spermophilus) and one tree squirrel (genus Sciurus), mountain hare (genus Lepus), and rabbit (genus Oryctolagus). These data supplemented with GTG banding comparisons allowed us to build comparative chromosome maps. Our data showed the absence of previously found squirrel associations HSA 1/8 and 2/17 in the Eurasian ground squirrels--sousliks and woodchucks, and disruptions of squirrel HSA 10/13 and HSA 8/4/8/12/22 syntenies in the four Spermophilus species studied here. We found that the karyotypes of Sciuridae and Leporidae are highly conserved and close to the Rodentia ancestral karyotype, while Castoridae chromosomes underwent many more changes. We suggest that Lagomorpha and Sciuridae (in contrast to all other rodent families) should be considered as core Glires lineages, characterized by cytogenetically conserved karyotypes which contain chromosomal elements inherent to karyotype of common Glires ancestor. Our data allowed us to further refine the putative ancestral karyotypes of Rodentia. We also describe here the putative ancestral karyotypes of Glires and lagomorphs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21559983     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-011-9210-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  58 in total

1.  Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting.

Authors:  F Yang; P C O'Brien; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  The effects of Cenozoic global change on squirrel phylogeny.

Authors:  John M Mercer; V Louise Roth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Origins of primate chromosomes - as delineated by Zoo-FISH and alignments of human and mouse draft genome sequences.

Authors:  L Froenicke
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps.

Authors:  William J Murphy; Denis M Larkin; Annelie Everts-van der Wind; Guillaume Bourque; Glenn Tesler; Loretta Auvil; Jonathan E Beever; Bhanu P Chowdhary; Francis Galibert; Lisa Gatzke; Christophe Hitte; Stacey N Meyers; Denis Milan; Elaine A Ostrander; Greg Pape; Heidi G Parker; Terje Raudsepp; Margarita B Rogatcheva; Lawrence B Schook; Loren C Skow; Michael Welge; James E Womack; Stephen J O'brien; Pavel A Pevzner; Harris A Lewin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Are molecular cytogenetics and bioinformatics suggesting diverging models of ancestral mammalian genomes?

Authors:  Lutz Froenicke; Montserrat Garcia Caldés; Alexander Graphodatsky; Stefan Müller; Leslie A Lyons; Terence J Robinson; Marianne Volleth; Fengtang Yang; Johannes Wienberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Chromosomal homeologies between human, harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) and the putative ancestral carnivore karyotype revealed by Zoo-FISH.

Authors:  L Frönicke; J Müller-Navia; K Romanakis; H Scherthan
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Karyotypic conservatism in the suborder Feliformia (Order Carnivora).

Authors:  P L Perelman; A S Graphodatsky; N A Serdukova; W Nie; E Z Alkalaeva; B Fu; T J Robinson; F Yang
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.636

8.  Chromosome banding pattern relationships of hares, rabbits, and pikas (order Lagomorpha). A phyletic interpretation.

Authors:  A D Stock
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1976

9.  Mitochondrial genomes reveal slow rates of molecular evolution and the timing of speciation in beavers (Castor), one of the largest rodent species.

Authors:  Susanne Horn; Walter Durka; Ronny Wolf; Aslak Ermala; Annegret Stubbe; Michael Stubbe; Michael Hofreiter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evolution of genome organizations of squirrels (Sciuridae) revealed by cross-species chromosome painting.

Authors:  Tangliang Li; Patricia C M O'Brien; Larisa Biltueva; Beiyuan Fu; Jinhuan Wang; Wenhui Nie; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.620

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal evolution in Rodentia.

Authors:  S A Romanenko; P L Perelman; V A Trifonov; A S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Karyotype diversity suggests that Laonastes aenigmamus (Laotian rock rat) (Rodentia, Diatomyidae) is a multi-specific genus.

Authors:  Florence Richard; Michèle Gerbault-Seureau; Bounneuang Douangboupha; Kham Keovichit; Jean-Pierre Hugot; Bernard Dutrillaux
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  A First Generation Comparative Chromosome Map between Guinea Pig (Cavia porcellus) and Humans.

Authors:  Svetlana A Romanenko; Polina L Perelman; Vladimir A Trifonov; Natalia A Serdyukova; Tangliang Li; Beiyuan Fu; Patricia C M O'Brien; Bee L Ng; Wenhui Nie; Thomas Liehr; Roscoe Stanyon; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.