Literature DB >> 12675306

Identification of chromosome rearrangements between the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus) and the Indian spiny mouse (Mus platythrix) by comparative FISH analysis.

Kazumi Matsubara1, Chizuko Nishida-Umehara, Asato Kuroiwa, Kimiyuki Tsuchiya, Yoichi Matsuda.   

Abstract

Comparative chromosome painting was applied to the Indian spiny mouse (Mus platythrix) with mouse (M. musculus) chromosome-specific probes for understanding the process of chromosome rearrangements between the two species. The chromosome locations of the 5S and 18S-28S ribosomal RNA genes and the order of the 119 and Tcp-1 genes in the In(17)2 region of the t-complex were also compared. All the painting probes were successfully hybridized to the Indian spiny mouse chromosomes, and a total of 27 segments homologous to mouse chromosomes were identified. The comparative FISH analysis revealed that tandem fusions were major events in the chromosome evolution of the Indian spiny mouse. In addition, other types of chromosome rearrangements, i.e. reciprocal translocations and insertions, were also included.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12675306     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022010116287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  17 in total

1.  Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that genomic rearrangement between rat and mouse proceeds ten times faster than between humans and cats.

Authors:  R Stanyon; F Yang; P Cavagna; P C O'Brien; M Bagga; M A Ferguson-Smith; J Wienberg
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1999

2.  Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting.

Authors:  F Yang; P C O'Brien; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Molecular evolution of the murine tspy genes.

Authors:  S Schubert; F Dechend; B Skawran; M Krawczak; J Schmidtke
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  2000

4.  Conservation of the rat X chromosome gene order in rodent species.

Authors:  A Kuroiwa; K Tsuchiya; T Watanabe; H Hishigaki; E Takahashi; T Namikawa; Y Matsuda
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 5.  Chromosome painting in mammals as an approach to comparative genomics.

Authors:  J Wienberg; R Stanyon
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  Evolution of mouse chromosome 17 and the origin of inversions associated with t haplotypes.

Authors:  M F Hammer; J Schimenti; L M Silver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Location of the mouse complement factor H gene (cfh) by FISH analysis and replication R-banding.

Authors:  Y Matsuda; Y N Harada; S Natsuume-Sakai; K Lee; T Shiomi; V M Chapman
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1992

8.  Genetic analysis of the proximal portion of the mouse t complex: evidence for a second inversion within t haplotypes.

Authors:  B Herrmann; M Bućan; P E Mains; A M Frischauf; L M Silver; H Lehrach
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-02-14       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of a haploid expressed gene encoding t complex polypeptide 1.

Authors:  K R Willison; K Dudley; J Potter
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-03-14       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  Application of fluorescence in situ hybridization in genome analysis of the mouse.

Authors:  Y Matsuda; V M Chapman
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.535

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal evolution in Rodentia.

Authors:  S A Romanenko; P L Perelman; V A Trifonov; A S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Phylogenomics of the genus Mus (Rodentia; Muridae): extensive genome repatterning is not restricted to the house mouse.

Authors:  Frederic Veyrunes; Gauthier Dobigny; Fengtang Yang; Patricia C M O'Brien; Josette Catalan; Terence J Robinson; Janice Britton-Davidian
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The origin and differentiation process of X and Y chromosomes of the black marsh turtle (Siebenrockiella crassicollis, Geoemydidae, Testudines).

Authors:  Taiki Kawagoshi; Chizuko Nishida; Yoichi Matsuda
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Karyotype evolution and phylogenetic relationships of hamsters (Cricetidae, Muroidea, Rodentia) inferred from chromosomal painting and banding comparison.

Authors:  Svetlana A Romanenko; Vitaly T Volobouev; Polina L Perelman; Vladimir S Lebedev; Natalya A Serdukova; Vladimir A Trifonov; Larisa S Biltueva; Wenhui Nie; Patricia C M O'Brien; Nina Sh Bulatova; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Comparative chromosome painting map between two Ryukyu spiny rat species, Tokudaia osimensis and Tokudaia tokunoshimensis (Muridae, Rodentia).

Authors:  Taro Nakamura; Asato Kuroiwa; Chizuko Nishida-Umehara; Kazumi Matsubara; Fumio Yamada; Yoichi Matsuda
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Praomys tullbergi (Muridae, Rodentia) genome architecture decoded by comparative chromosome painting with Mus and Rattus.

Authors:  Raquel Chaves; Sandra Louzada; Susana Meles; Johannes Wienberg; Filomena Adega
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Chromosomal phylogeny of four Akodontini species (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from southern Brazil established by Zoo-FISH using Mus musculus (Muridae) painting probes.

Authors:  Iris Hass; Ives José Sbalqueiro; Stefan Müller
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). I. The genome homology of tundra vole, field vole, mouse and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Authors:  Natalia A Sitnikova; Svetlana A Romanenko; Patricia C M O'Brien; Polina L Perelman; Beiyuan Fu; Nadezhda V Rubtsova; Natalya A Serdukova; Feodor N Golenishchev; Vladimir A Trifonov; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Chromosome homology between mouse and three Muridae species, Millardia meltada, Acomys dimidiatus and Micromys minutus, and conserved chromosome segments in murid karyotypes.

Authors:  Taro Nakamura; Kazumi Matsubara; Shumpei P Yasuda; Kimiyuki Tsuchiya; Yoichi Matsuda
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Karyotypic evolution of Apodemus (Muridae, Rodentia) inferred from comparative FISH analyses.

Authors:  Kazumi Matsubara; Chizuko Nishida-Umehara; Kimiyuki Tsuchiya; Daiki Nukaya; Yoichi Matsuda
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.