Literature DB >> 17318655

Evoked cochlear potentials in the barn owl.

Christine Köppl1, Otto Gleich.   

Abstract

Gross electrical responses to tone bursts were measured in adult barn owls, using a single-ended wire electrode placed onto the round window. Cochlear microphonic (CM) and compound action potential (CAP) responses were evaluated separately. Both potentials were physiologically vulnerable. Selective abolishment of neural responses at high frequencies confirmed that the CAP was of neural origin, while the CM remained unaffected. CAP latencies decreased with increasing stimulus frequency and CAP amplitudes were correlated with known variations in afferent fibre numbers from the different papillar regions. This suggests a local origin of the CAP along the tonotopic gradient within the basilar papilla. The audiograms derived from CAP and CM threshold responses both showed a broad frequency region of optimal sensitivity, very similar to behavioural and single-unit data, but shifted upward in absolute sensitivity. CAP thresholds rose above 8 kHz, while CM responses showed unchanged sensitivity up to 10 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17318655     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-007-0215-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   2.389


  31 in total

1.  Electrical responses from the chicken basilar papilla.

Authors:  R B Patuzzi; C L Bull
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Auditory brainstem responses in the Eastern Screech Owl: an estimate of auditory thresholds.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Bernard Lohr; D Caldwell Hahn; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Discharge patterns of single fibers in the pigeon auditory nerve.

Authors:  M B Sachs; E D Young; R H Lewis
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-04-26       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Effects of kanamycin ototoxicity and hair cell regeneration on the DC endocochlear potential in adult chickens.

Authors:  L Chen; P G Trautwein; K Miller; R J Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Electrophysiological study of the maturation of auditory responses from the inner ear of the chick.

Authors:  G Rebillard; E W Rubel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-12-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Quantification of solute entry into cochlear perilymph through the round window membrane.

Authors:  A N Salt; Y Ma
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Auditory nerve neurophonic recorded from the round window of the Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  K R Henry
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Functional recovery of hearing following ampa-induced reversible disruption of hair cell afferent synapses in the avian inner ear.

Authors:  D Reng; M Müller; J W Smolders
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  A quantitative study of cochlear afferent axons in birds.

Authors:  C Köppl; A Wegscheider; O Gleich; G A Manley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  14 in total

1.  Specialization for underwater hearing by the tympanic middle ear of the turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Christian Brandt; Katie L Willis; Christian Bech Christensen; Darlene Ketten; Peggy Edds-Walton; Richard R Fay; Peter T Madsen; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Reverse correlation analysis of auditory-nerve fiber responses to broadband noise in a bird, the barn owl.

Authors:  Bertrand Fontaine; Christine Köppl; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-15

3.  A comparison of auditory brainstem responses across diving bird species.

Authors:  Sara E Crowell; Alicia M Wells-Berlin; Catherine E Carr; Glenn H Olsen; Ronald E Therrien; Sally E Yannuzzi; Darlene R Ketten
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Auditory responses in the barn owl's nucleus laminaris to clicks: impulse response and signal analysis of neurophonic potential.

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Better than fish on land? Hearing across metamorphosis in salamanders.

Authors:  Christian Bech Christensen; Henrik Lauridsen; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Michael Pedersen; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Methylmercury Exposure Reduces the Auditory Brainstem Response of Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata ).

Authors:  Sarah E Wolf; John P Swaddle; Daniel A Cristol; William J Buchser
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-30

7.  Biophysics of directional hearing in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis).

Authors:  Hilary S Bierman; Jennifer L Thornton; Heath G Jones; Kanthaiah Koka; Bruce A Young; Christian Brandt; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  The auditory brainstem response in two lizard species.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Yezhong Tang; Catherine Carr; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The Binaural Interaction Component in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Presents few Differences to Mammalian Data.

Authors:  Nicolas Palanca-Castan; Geneviève Laumen; Darrin Reed; Christine Köppl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25

10.  Frequency sensitivity in Northern saw-whet owls (Aegolius acadicus).

Authors:  Julia R Beatini; Glenn A Proudfoot; Megan D Gall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.