Literature DB >> 27562803

The Binaural Interaction Component in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Presents few Differences to Mammalian Data.

Nicolas Palanca-Castan1, Geneviève Laumen2, Darrin Reed3, Christine Köppl2.   

Abstract

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is an evoked potential that reflects the responses to sound by brainstem neural centers. The binaural interaction component (BIC) is obtained by subtracting the sum of the monaural ABR responses from the binaural response. Its latency and amplitude change in response to variations in binaural cues. The BIC is thus thought to reflect the activity of binaural nuclei and is used to non-invasively test binaural processing. However, any conclusions are limited by a lack of knowledge of the relevant processes at the level of individual neurons. The aim of this study was to characterize the ABR and BIC in the barn owl, an animal where the ITD-processing neural circuits are known in great detail. We recorded ABR responses to chirps and to 1 and 4 kHz tones from anesthetized barn owls. General characteristics of the barn owl ABR were similar to those observed in other bird species. The most prominent peak of the BIC was associated with nucleus laminaris and is thus likely to reflect the known processes of ITD computation in this nucleus. However, the properties of the BIC were very similar to previously published mammalian data and did not reveal any specific diagnostic features. For example, the polarity of the BIC was negative, which indicates a smaller response to binaural stimulation than predicted by the sum of monaural responses. This is contrary to previous predictions for an excitatory-excitatory system such as nucleus laminaris. Similarly, the change in BIC latency with varying ITD was not distinguishable from mammalian data. Contrary to previous predictions, this behavior appears unrelated to the known underlying neural delay-line circuitry. In conclusion, the generation of the BIC is currently inadequately understood and common assumptions about the BIC need to be reconsidered when interpreting such measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory brainstem response; Barn owl; Binaural interaction component; Binaural processing; Interaural time differences

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27562803      PMCID: PMC5112217          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0583-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  60 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  A circuit for coding interaural time differences in the chick brainstem.

Authors:  E M Overholt; E W Rubel; R L Hyson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Tolerance to sound intensity of binaural coincidence detection in the nucleus laminaris of the owl.

Authors:  J L Peña; S Viete; Y Albeck; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A functional circuit model of interaural time difference processing.

Authors:  Thomas McColgan; Sahil Shah; Christine Köppl; Catherine Carr; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Projections of nucleus angularis and nucleus laminaris to the lateral lemniscal nuclear complex of the barn owl.

Authors:  T T Takahashi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-08-08       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences.

Authors:  P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Auditory brain stem responses evoked by lateralized clicks: is lateralization extracted in the human brain stem?

Authors:  Helmut Riedel; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Generation of auditory brain stem responses (ABRs). II. Effects of surgical section of the trapezoid body on the ABR in guinea pigs and cat.

Authors:  S I Wada; A Starr
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-10

10.  Evoked cochlear potentials in the barn owl.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Otto Gleich
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.389

View more
  4 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem response wave III is correlated with extracellular field potentials from nucleus laminaris of the barn owl.

Authors:  Paula T Kuokkanen; Anna Kraemer; Richard Kempter; Christine Köppl; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Acta Acust United Acust       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

2.  Development of auditory sensitivity in the barn owl.

Authors:  Anna Kraemer; Caitlin Baxter; Alayna Hendrix; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Auditory performance in bald eagles and red-tailed hawks: a comparative study of hearing in diurnal raptors.

Authors:  JoAnn McGee; Peggy B Nelson; Julia B Ponder; Jeffrey Marr; Patrick Redig; Edward J Walsh
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Dipolar extracellular potentials generated by axonal projections.

Authors:  Thomas McColgan; Ji Liu; Paula Tuulia Kuokkanen; Catherine Emily Carr; Hermann Wagner; Richard Kempter
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.