Literature DB >> 20707448

The auditory brainstem response in two lizard species.

Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell1, Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard, Yezhong Tang, Catherine Carr, Robert J Dooling.   

Abstract

Although lizards have highly sensitive ears, it is difficult to condition them to sound, making standard psychophysical assays of hearing sensitivity impractical. This paper describes non-invasive measurements of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in both Tokay geckos (Gekko gecko; nocturnal animals, known for their loud vocalizations) and the green anole (Anolis carolinensis, diurnal, non-vocal animals). Hearing sensitivity was measured in 5 geckos and 7 anoles. The lizards were sedated with isoflurane, and ABRs were measured at levels of 1 and 3% isoflurane. The typical ABR waveform in response to click stimulation showed one prominent and several smaller peaks occurring within 10 ms of the stimulus onset. ABRs to brief tone bursts revealed that geckos and anoles were most sensitive between 1.6-2 kHz and had similar hearing sensitivity up to about 5 kHz (thresholds typically 20-50 dB SPL). Above 5 kHz, however, anoles were more than 20 dB more sensitive than geckos and showed a wider range of sensitivity (1-7 kHz). Generally, thresholds from ABR audiograms were comparable to those of small birds. Best hearing sensitivity, however, extended over a larger frequency range in lizards than in most bird species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20707448      PMCID: PMC2933256          DOI: 10.1121/1.3458813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  39 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of structure and function of the hearing organ of lizards.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2002-11-05

2.  Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds.

Authors:  Steven J Aiken; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Central projections of the statoacoustic nerve in Caiman crocodilus.

Authors:  P A Leake
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention.

Authors:  T W Picton; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-02

5.  Effects of rise time on simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked potentials from the early, middle and late ranges.

Authors:  K Kodera; R F Hink; O Yamada; J I Suzuki
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1979

6.  Otoacoustic emissions, hair cells, and myosin motors.

Authors:  G A Manley; L Gallo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Quantitative studies of auditory hair cells and nerves in lizards.

Authors:  M R Miller
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Effects of age and size in the ears of gekkotan lizards: auditory sensitivity, its determinants, and new insights into tetrapod middle-ear function.

Authors:  Yehudah L Werner; Lynda G Montgomery; Merav Seifan; James C Saunders
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.657

9.  Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man.

Authors:  H Sohmer; H Pratt; R Kinarti
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-05

10.  Evoked cochlear potentials in the barn owl.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Otto Gleich
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.389

View more
  19 in total

1.  Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea).

Authors:  Nathan P Buerkle; Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.320

2.  Binaural processing by the gecko auditory periphery.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Yezhong Tang; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Better than fish on land? Hearing across metamorphosis in salamanders.

Authors:  Christian Bech Christensen; Henrik Lauridsen; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Michael Pedersen; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Divalent counterions tether membrane-bound carbohydrates to promote the cohesion of auditory hair bundles.

Authors:  Adria C LeBoeuf; D Ó Maoiléidigh; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Earless toads sense low frequencies but miss the high notes.

Authors:  Molly C Womack; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Luis A Coloma; Juan C Chaparro; Kim L Hoke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Vocal plasticity in a reptile.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm; Sue Anne Zollinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Organization of the auditory brainstem in a lizard, Gekko gecko. I. Auditory nerve, cochlear nuclei, and superior olivary nuclei.

Authors:  Yezhong Tang; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Comparison of otoacoustic emissions within gecko subfamilies: morphological implications for auditory function in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.