Literature DB >> 26156644

A comparison of auditory brainstem responses across diving bird species.

Sara E Crowell1, Alicia M Wells-Berlin, Catherine E Carr, Glenn H Olsen, Ronald E Therrien, Sally E Yannuzzi, Darlene R Ketten.   

Abstract

There is little biological data available for diving birds because many live in hard-to-study, remote habitats. Only one species of diving bird, the black-footed penguin (Spheniscus demersus), has been studied in respect to auditory capabilities (Wever et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 63:676-680, 1969). We, therefore, measured in-air auditory threshold in ten species of diving birds, using the auditory brainstem response (ABR). The average audiogram obtained for each species followed the U-shape typical of birds and many other animals. All species tested shared a common region of the greatest sensitivity, from 1000 to 3000 Hz, although audiograms differed significantly across species. Thresholds of all duck species tested were more similar to each other than to the two non-duck species tested. The red-throated loon (Gavia stellata) and northern gannet (Morus bassanus) exhibited the highest thresholds while the lowest thresholds belonged to the duck species, specifically the lesser scaup (Aythya affinis) and ruddy duck (Oxyura jamaicensis). Vocalization parameters were also measured for each species, and showed that with the exception of the common eider (Somateria mollisima), the peak frequency, i.e., frequency at the greatest intensity, of all species' vocalizations measured here fell between 1000 and 3000 Hz, matching the bandwidth of the most sensitive hearing range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156644      PMCID: PMC4512887          DOI: 10.1007/s00359-015-1024-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  42 in total

1.  Audiogram, body mass, and basilar papilla length: correlations in birds and predictions for extinct archosaurs.

Authors:  Otto Gleich; Robert J Dooling; Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-10-18

2.  A comparison of underwater hearing sensitivity in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) determined by electrophysiological and behavioral methods.

Authors:  Dorian S Houser; James J Finneran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An experimental investigation into the effects of traffic noise on distributions of birds: avoiding the phantom road.

Authors:  Christopher J W McClure; Heidi E Ware; Jay Carlisle; Gregory Kaltenecker; Jesse R Barber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Peripheral auditory processing changes seasonally in Gambel's white-crowned sparrow.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Eliot Brenowitz; Edwin W Rubel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Electrophysiological and morphological development of the inner ear in Belgian Waterslager canaries.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Robert J Dooling; Brenda Ryals; Otto Gleich
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Pressure equilibration in the penguin middle ear.

Authors:  Jacob Sadé; Yves Handrich; Joelle Bernheim; David Cohen
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Heart rate regulation and extreme bradycardia in diving emperor penguins.

Authors:  Jessica U Meir; Torre K Stockard; Cassondra L Williams; Katherine V Ponganis; Paul J Ponganis
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Detection of interaural time differences in the alligator.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Daphne Soares; Jean Smolders; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Evoked cochlear potentials in the barn owl.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Otto Gleich
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.389

10.  Prolonged maturation of cochlear function in the barn owl after hatching.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Regina Nickel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 2.389

View more
  8 in total

1.  Audiogram of the mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos) from 16 Hz to 9 kHz.

Authors:  Evan M Hill
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  In-air hearing of a diving duck: A comparison of psychoacoustic and auditory brainstem response thresholds.

Authors:  Sara E Crowell; Alicia M Wells-Berlin; Ronald E Therrien; Sally E Yannuzzi; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Methylmercury Exposure Reduces the Auditory Brainstem Response of Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata ).

Authors:  Sarah E Wolf; John P Swaddle; Daniel A Cristol; William J Buchser
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-30

4.  Development of auditory sensitivity in the barn owl.

Authors:  Anna Kraemer; Caitlin Baxter; Alayna Hendrix; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings.

Authors:  George Ordiway; Miranda McDonnell; Sandesh Mohan; Jason Tait Sanchez
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 1.424

6.  Auditory performance in bald eagles and red-tailed hawks: a comparative study of hearing in diurnal raptors.

Authors:  JoAnn McGee; Peggy B Nelson; Julia B Ponder; Jeffrey Marr; Patrick Redig; Edward J Walsh
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  In-air hearing of the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo).

Authors:  Alyssa Maxwell; Kirstin Anderson Hansen; Sara Torres Ortiz; Ole Næsbye Larsen; Ursula Siebert; Magnus Wahlberg
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Aquatic birds have middle ears adapted to amphibious lifestyles.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Zeyl; Edward P Snelling; Maelle Connan; Mathieu Basille; Thomas A Clay; Rocío Joo; Samantha C Patrick; Richard A Phillips; Pierre A Pistorius; Peter G Ryan; Albert Snyman; Susana Clusella-Trullas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.