Literature DB >> 10601718

A quantitative study of cochlear afferent axons in birds.

C Köppl1, A Wegscheider, O Gleich, G A Manley.   

Abstract

This paper is a comparative study of auditory-nerve morphology in birds. The chicken (Gallus gallus), the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) and the starling (Sturnus vulgaris) were chosen as unspecialised birds that have already been used in auditory research. The data are discussed in comparison to a similar earlier study on the barn owl, a bird with highly specialised hearing, in an attempt to separate general avian patterns from species specialisations. Average numbers of afferent fibres from 8775 (starling) to 12¿ omitted¿406 (chicken) were counted, excluding fibres to the lagenar macula. The number of fibres representing different frequency ranges showed broad maxima in the chicken and emu, corresponding to hearing ranges of best sensitivity and/or particular behavioural relevance. Mean axon diameters were around 2 microm in the chicken and starling, and around 3 microm in the emu. Virtually all auditory afferents were myelinated. The mean thickness of the myelin sheaths was between 0.33 microm (starling) and 0.4 microm (emu). There was a consistent pattern in the diameters of axons deriving from different regions. Axons from very basal, i.e. highest-frequency, parts of the basilar papilla were always the smallest. In the emu and the chicken, axons from the middle papillar regions were, in addition, larger than axons innervating apical regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10601718     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00178-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Inner-ear morphology of the New Zealand kiwi (Apteryx mantelli) suggests high-frequency specialization.

Authors:  Jeremy R Corfield; M Fabiana Kubke; Stuart Parsons; Christine Köppl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-07

Review 2.  Animal models of hidden hearing loss: Does auditory-nerve-fiber loss cause real-world listening difficulties?

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.314

Review 3.  Evolution of vertebrate mechanosensory hair cells and inner ears: toward identifying stimuli that select mutation driven altered morphologies.

Authors:  Bernd Fritzsch; Hans Straka
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Normal Tone-In-Noise Sensitivity in Trained Budgerigars despite Substantial Auditory-Nerve Injury: No Evidence of Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  A blueprint for vocal learning: auditory predispositions from brains to genomes.

Authors:  David Wheatcroft; Anna Qvarnström
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Persistent Auditory Nerve Damage Following Kainic Acid Excitotoxicity in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

7.  Evoked cochlear potentials in the barn owl.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Otto Gleich
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.389

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.