Literature DB >> 16240826

Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English.

Rajka Smiljanić1, Ann R Bradlow.   

Abstract

Previous research has established that naturally produced English clear speech is more intelligible than English conversational speech. The major goal of this paper was to establish the presence of the clear speech effect in production and perception of a language other than English, namely Croatian. A systematic investigation of the conversational-to-clear speech transformations across languages with different phonological properties (e.g., large versus small vowel inventory) can provide a window into the interaction of general auditory-perceptual and phonological, structural factors that contribute to the high intelligibility of clear speech. The results of this study showed that naturally produced clear speech is a distinct, listener-oriented, intelligibility-enhancing mode of speech production in both languages. Furthermore, the acoustic-phonetic features of the conversational-to-clear speech transformation revealed cross-language similarities in clear speech production strategies. In both languages, talkers exhibited a decrease in speaking rate and an increase in pitch range, as well as an expansion of the vowel space. Notably, the findings of this study showed equivalent vowel space expansion in English and Croatian clear speech, despite the difference in vowel inventory size across the two languages, suggesting that the extent of vowel contrast enhancement in hyperarticulated clear speech is independent of vowel inventory size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16240826      PMCID: PMC1850617          DOI: 10.1121/1.2000788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates.

Authors:  Jean C Krause; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Sheng Liu; Elsa Del Rio; Ann R Bradlow; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; J E Andruski; I A Chistovich; L A Chistovich; E V Kozhevnikova; V L Ryskina; E I Stolyarova; U Sundberg; F Lacerda
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Spatio-temporal patterns of velopharyngeal action in phonetic and phonological nasalization.

Authors:  M J Solé
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

6.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate.

Authors:  R M Uchanski; S S Choi; L D Braida; C M Reed; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-06

7.  Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children.

Authors:  Valerie Hazan; Duncan Markham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus; Erin Hayes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  K L Payton; R M Uchanski; L D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  42 in total

1.  Bidirectional clear speech perception benefit for native and high-proficiency non-native talkers and listeners: intelligibility and accentedness.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Intelligibility and acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech in telugu (a South Indian dravidian language).

Authors:  Naresh Durisala; S G R Prakash; Arivudai Nambi; Ridhima Batra
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-11

3.  Effects of the acoustic properties of infant-directed speech on infant word recognition.

Authors:  Jae Yung Song; Katherine Demuth; James Morgan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Temporal organization of English clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Stability of Temporal Contrasts across Speaking Styles in English and Croatian.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanic; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2008-01

7.  English vowel spaces produced by Japanese speakers: the smaller point vowels' and the greater schwas'.

Authors:  Kaoru Tomita; Jun Yamada; Shigenobu Takatsuka
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-10

8.  A new method for eliciting three speaking styles in the laboratory.

Authors:  James D Harnsberger; Richard Wright; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.017

9.  Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.