Literature DB >> 16642857

Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise.

M L Garcia Lecumberri1, Martin Cooke.   

Abstract

Spoken communication in a non-native language is especially difficult in the presence of noise. This study compared English and Spanish listeners' perceptions of English intervocalic consonants as a function of masker type. Three maskers (stationary noise, multitalker babble, and competing speech) provided varying amounts of energetic and informational masking. Competing English and Spanish speech maskers were used to examine the effect of masker language. Non-native performance fell short of that of native listeners in quiet, but a larger performance differential was found for all masking conditions. Both groups performed better in competing speech than in stationary noise, and both suffered most in babble. Since babble is a less effective energetic masker than stationary noise, these results suggest that non-native listeners are more adversely affected by both energetic and informational masking. A strong correlation was found between non-native performance in quiet and degree of deterioration in noise, suggesting that non-native phonetic category learning can be fragile. A small effect of language background was evident: English listeners performed better when the competing speech was Spanish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16642857     DOI: 10.1121/1.2180210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  45 in total

1.  Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Conversational and clear speech intelligibility of /bVd/ syllables produced by native and non-native English speakers.

Authors:  Catherine L Rogers; Teresa M DeMasi; Jean C Krause
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Yi-ping Chang; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perception of Place of Articulation for Plosives and Fricatives in Noise.

Authors:  Abeer Alwan; Jintao Jiang; Willa Chen
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Contextual variability during speech-in-speech recognition.

Authors:  Susanne Brouwer; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The Effect of Intensified Language Exposure on Accommodating Talker Variability.

Authors:  Mark Antoniou; Patrick C M Wong; Suiping Wang
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Working memory training to improve speech perception in noise across languages.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Sumitrajit Dhar; Patrick C M Wong; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Error patterns of native and non-native listeners' perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  Benjamin D Zinszer; Meredith Riggs; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perception of Native English Reduced Forms in Adverse Environments by Chinese Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Simpson W L Wong; Jenny K Y Tsui; Bonnie Wing-Yin Chow; Vina W H Leung; Peggy Mok; Kevin Kien-Hoa Chung
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.