Literature DB >> 17297796

Individual differences in the masking level difference with a narrowband masker at 500 or 2000 Hz.

Emily Buss1, Joseph W Hall, John H Grose.   

Abstract

The masking level difference (MLD) for a narrowband noise masker is associated with marked individual differences. This pair of studies examines factors that might account for these individual differences. Experiment 1 estimated the MLD for a 50 Hz wide band of masking noise centered at 500 or 2000 Hz, gated on for 400 ms. Tonal signals were either brief (15 ms) or long (200 ms), and brief signals were coincident with either a dip or peak in the masker envelope. Experiment 2 estimated the MLD for both signal and masker consisting of a 50 Hz wide bandpass noise centered on 500 Hz. Signals were generated to provide only interaural phase cues, only interaural level cues, or both. The pattern of individual differences was dominated by variability in NoSpi thresholds, and NoSpi thresholds were highly correlated across all conditions. Results suggest that the individual differences observed in Experiment 1 were not primarily driven by differences in the use of binaural fine structure cues or in binaural temporal resolution. The range of thresholds obtained for a brief NoSpi tonal signal at 500 Hz was consistent with a model based on normalized interaural correlation. This model was not consistent for analogous conditions at 2000 Hz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17297796      PMCID: PMC1866280          DOI: 10.1121/1.2400849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Effects of temporal separation and masker level on binaural analysis in forward masking.

Authors:  M F Yama
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Masker fluctuation and the masking-level difference.

Authors:  J H Grose; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Inter-individual differences in binaural detection of low-frequency or high-frequency tonal signals masked by narrow-band or broadband noise.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; C Trahiotis; E L Hyde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  S van de Par; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural forward and backward masking: evidence for sluggishness in binaural detection.

Authors:  B Kollmeier; R H Gilkey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Some physical and psychological effects produced by selective delays of the envelope of narrow bands of noise.

Authors:  C A Amenta; C Trahiotis; L R Bernstein; J M Nuetzel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Performance in several binaural-interaction experiments.

Authors:  J Koehnke; H S Colburn; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Interaural correlation discrimination: II. Relation to binaural unmasking.

Authors:  N I Durlach; K J Gabriel; H S Colburn; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Masker-bandwidth dependence in homophasic and antiphasic tone detection.

Authors:  P M Zurek; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Discrimination of dynamic interaural intensity differences.

Authors:  D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  The role of off-frequency masking in binaural hearing.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Influences of modulation and spatial separation on detection of a masked broadband target.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21

4.  Exploring the additivity of binaural and monaural masking release.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of non-simultaneous masking on the binaural masking level difference.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall Iii
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Sarah L Hodgson; Mary Ellen Scherer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28

7.  Comparison of two cortical measures of binaural hearing acuity.

Authors:  Won So; Spencer B Smith
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Binaural Frequency Modulation Detection in School-Age Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Effects of Interaural Modulator Phase.

Authors:  Stacey G Kane; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Pulse-rate discrimination by cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners with and without binaural cues.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Long; John M Deeks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.