Literature DB >> 3711454

Interaural correlation discrimination: II. Relation to binaural unmasking.

N I Durlach, K J Gabriel, H S Colburn, C Trahiotis.   

Abstract

Many theoretical models of binaural interaction assume that sensitivity to interaural correlation underlies binaural unmasking. This paper explores the extent to which sensitivity to changes in interaural correlation implied by results from binaural detection experiments are consistent with sensitivity to changes in interaural correlation implied by results from binaural detection experiments are consistent with sensitivity to changes in interaural correlation measured directly in correlation discrimination experiments. The vehicle for this exploration is a simplified model of the underlying processes assumed by many models of binaural unmasking for the detection of narrow-band signals in the presence of broadband noise. Consideration is given to psychometric function slopes, detection thresholds, bandwidth effects, duration effects, level effects, and interaural-parameter effects. Although many of the results obtained from our analysis are consistent with the notion that the cue in binaural detection tasks is a change in interaural correlation, some significant inconsistencies are noted.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3711454     DOI: 10.1121/1.393681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Untrained listeners experience difficulty detecting interaural correlation changes in narrowband noises.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Mary E Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory midbrain representation of a break in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Liang Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Individual differences in the masking level difference with a narrowband masker at 500 or 2000 Hz.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Interaural coherence for noise bands: waveforms and envelopes.

Authors:  Neil L Aaronson; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Relating interaural difference sensitivities for several parameters measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Monica L Hawley; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Evidence for opponent-channel coding of interaural time differences in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  David A Magezi; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Apparent auditory source width insensitivity in older hearing-impaired individuals.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Bernhard U Seeber; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Contributions of intrinsic neural and stimulus variance to binaural sensitivity.

Authors:  Trevor M Shackleton; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.