Literature DB >> 3558963

Masker-bandwidth dependence in homophasic and antiphasic tone detection.

P M Zurek, N I Durlach.   

Abstract

Thresholds for the detection of 500-ms tones in noise at either 0.25 or 4 kHz and either interaurally in-phase (NoSo) or out-of-phase (NoS pi) were measured as a function of the bandwidth of a diotic masking noise (with total noise power held constant). NoSo thresholds followed the classic trend indicative of an effective critical band in noise masking. NoS pi thresholds also indicated critical-band filtering, but with a wider effective critical bandwidth. At subcritical masker bandwidths, for both 0.25 and 4 kHz, NoS pi thresholds increased with an increase in noise bandwidth, despite the fact that total noise power was constant. This latter finding is attributed to binaural insensitivity to rapid fluctuations in the interaural cues that subserve detection in the NoS pi condition. These results suggest a new interpretation for the small difference between NoSo and NoS pi thresholds measured with high-frequency tones in a broadband noise masker. This interpretation is based partly on the inability to utilize rapidly varying interaural cues, partly on out-of-band interference effects, and partly on loss of information related to stimulus fine structure.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3558963     DOI: 10.1121/1.394911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  The role of off-frequency masking in binaural hearing.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Development of the auditory system.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2015

3.  Individual differences in the masking level difference with a narrowband masker at 500 or 2000 Hz.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21

5.  Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The interaural time difference pathway: a comparison of spectral bandwidth and correlation sensitivity at three anatomical levels.

Authors:  Myles McLaughlin; Tom P Franken; Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-09

7.  Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Sarah L Hodgson; Mary Ellen Scherer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28

8.  Across-channel interaural-level-difference processing demonstrates frequency dependence.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Olga A Stakhovskaya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Interaural correlation fails to account for detection in a classic binaural task: dynamic ITDs dominate N0Spi detection.

Authors:  Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-17

10.  The extent to which a position-based explanation accounts for binaural release from informational masking.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Nathaniel I Durlach; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.