Literature DB >> 17236425

Sociality in theridiid spiders: repeated origins of an evolutionary dead end.

Ingi Agnarsson1, Leticia Avilés, Jonathan A Coddington, Wayne P Maddison.   

Abstract

Evolutionary "dead ends" result from traits that are selectively advantageous in the short term but ultimately result in lowered diversification rates of lineages. In spiders, 23 species scattered across eight families share a social system in which individuals live in colonies and cooperate in nest maintenance, prey capture, and brood care. Most of these species are inbred and have highly female-biased sex ratios. Here we show that in Theridiidae this social system originated eight to nine times independently among 11 to 12 species for a remarkable 18 to 19 origins across spiders. In Theridiidae, the origins cluster significantly in one clade marked by a possible preadaptation: extended maternal care. In most derivations, sociality is limited to isolated species: social species are sister to social species only thrice. To examine whether sociality in spiders represents an evolutionary dead end, we develop a test that compares the observed phylogenetic isolation of social species to the simulated evolution of social and non-social clades under equal diversification rates, and find that sociality in Theridiidae is significantly isolated. Because social clades are not in general smaller than their nonsocial sister clades, the "spindly" phylogenetic pattern-many tiny replicate social clades-may be explained by extinction rapid enough that a nonsocial sister group does not have time to diversify while the social lineage remains extant. In this case, this repeated origin and extinction of sociality suggests a conflict between the short-term benefits and long-term costs of inbred sociality. Although benefits of group living may initially outweigh costs of inbreeding (hence the replicate origins), in the long run the subdivision of the populations in relatively small and highly inbred colony lineages may result in higher extinction, thus an evolutionary dead end.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17236425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  30 in total

Review 1.  Hamilton's rule and the causes of social evolution.

Authors:  Andrew F G Bourke
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Gradients of precipitation and ant abundance may contribute to the altitudinal range limit of subsocial spiders: insights from a transplant experiment.

Authors:  Jessica Purcell; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Social spiders of the genus Anelosimus occur in wetter, more productive environments than non-social species.

Authors:  Marija Majer; Ingi Agnarsson; Jens-Christian Svenning; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-11-01

4.  Kin structure, ecology and the evolution of social organization in shrimp: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  J Emmett Duffy; Kenneth S Macdonald
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Prey to predator body size ratio in the evolution of cooperative hunting-a social spider test case.

Authors:  Lena Grinsted; Mads F Schou; Virginia Settepani; Christina Holm; Tharina L Bird; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 0.900

6.  Predictors of colony extinction vary by habitat type in social spiders.

Authors:  Brendan L McEwen; James L L Lichtenstein; David N Fisher; Colin M Wright; Greg T Chism; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Subsocial behaviour and brood adoption in mixed-species colonies of two theridiid spiders.

Authors:  Lena Grinsted; Ingi Agnarsson; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-10-24

8.  Gall-induction in insects: evolutionary dead-end or speciation driver?

Authors:  Nate B Hardy; Lyn G Cook
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Exposure to predators reduces collective foraging aggressiveness and eliminates its relationship with colony personality composition.

Authors:  Colin M Wright; James L L Lichtenstein; Graham A Montgomery; Lauren P Luscuskie; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Benefits of cooperation with genetic kin in a subsocial spider.

Authors:  J M Schneider; T Bilde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.