Literature DB >> 31768622

Prey to predator body size ratio in the evolution of cooperative hunting-a social spider test case.

Lena Grinsted1, Mads F Schou2, Virginia Settepani3, Christina Holm3, Tharina L Bird4, Trine Bilde5.   

Abstract

One of the benefits of cooperative hunting may be that predators can subdue larger prey. In spiders, cooperative, social species can capture prey many times larger than an individual predator. However, we propose that cooperative prey capture does not have to be associated with larger caught prey per se, but with an increase in the ratio of prey to predator body size. This can be achieved either by catching larger prey while keeping predator body size constant, or by evolving a smaller predator body size while maintaining capture of large prey. We show that within a genus of relatively large spiders, Stegodyphus, subsocial spiders representing the ancestral state of social species are capable of catching the largest prey available in the environment. Hence, within this genus, the evolution of cooperation would not provide access to otherwise inaccessible, large prey. Instead, we show that social Stegodyphus spiders are smaller than their subsocial counterparts, while catching similar sized prey, leading to the predicted increase in prey-predator size ratio with sociality. We further show that in a genus of small spiders, Anelosimus, the level of sociality is associated with an increased size of prey caught while predator size is unaffected by sociality, leading to a similar, predicted increase in prey-predator size ratio. In summary, we find support for our proposed 'prey to predator size ratio hypothesis' and discuss how relaxed selection on large body size in the evolution of social, cooperative living may provide adaptive benefits for ancestrally relatively large predators.

Keywords:  Dietary niche; Group living; Phenotypic plasticity; Predator-prey interactions; Social evolution

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31768622     DOI: 10.1007/s00427-019-00640-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Genes Evol        ISSN: 0949-944X            Impact factor:   0.900


  24 in total

1.  The transition to social inbred mating systems in spiders: role of inbreeding tolerance in a subsocial predecessor.

Authors:  Trine Bilde; Yael Lubin; Deborah Smith; Jutta M Schneider; Alexei A Maklakov
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Spider webs designed for rare but life-saving catches.

Authors:  Samuel Venner; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations.

Authors:  Luke J Harmon; Jason T Weir; Chad D Brock; Richard E Glor; Wendell Challenger
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Social spiders of the genus Anelosimus occur in wetter, more productive environments than non-social species.

Authors:  Marija Majer; Ingi Agnarsson; Jens-Christian Svenning; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-11-01

5.  Colony size and individual fitness in the social spider Anelosimus eximius.

Authors:  L Avilés; P Tufiño
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Evolution of sociality in spiders leads to depleted genomic diversity at both population and species levels.

Authors:  V Settepani; M F Schou; M Greve; L Grinsted; J Bechsgaard; T Bilde
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Trait overdispersion and the role of sociality in the assembly of social spider communities across the Americas.

Authors:  Philippe Fernandez-Fournier; Jennifer Guevara; Catherine Hoffman; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Task specialization in two social spiders, Stegodyphus sarasinorum (Eresidae) and Anelosimus eximius (Theridiidae).

Authors:  V Settepani; L Grinsted; J Granfeldt; J L Jensen; T Bilde
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider.

Authors:  Lena Grinsted; Jonathan N Pruitt; Virginia Settepani; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Habitat productivity constrains the distribution of social spiders across continents - case study of the genus Stegodyphus.

Authors:  Marija Majer; Jens-Christian Svenning; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.172

View more
  1 in total

1.  The sources of variation for individual prey-to-predator size ratios.

Authors:  Sara Magalhães; Jordi Moya-Laraño; Jorge F Henriques; Mariángeles Lacava; Celeste Guzmán; Maria Pilar Gavín-Centol; Dolores Ruiz-Lupión; Eva De Mas
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.821

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.