Literature DB >> 18658236

Benefits of cooperation with genetic kin in a subsocial spider.

J M Schneider1, T Bilde.   

Abstract

Interaction within groups exploiting a common resource may be prone to cheating by selfish actions that result in disadvantages for all members of the group, including the selfish individuals. Kin selection is one mechanism by which such dilemmas can be resolved. This is because selfish acts toward relatives include the cost of lowering indirect fitness benefits that could otherwise be achieved through the propagation of shared genes. Kin selection theory has been proved to be of general importance for the origin of cooperative behaviors, but other driving forces, such as direct fitness benefits, can also promote helping behavior in many cooperatively breeding taxa. Investigating transitional systems is therefore particularly suitable for understanding the influence of kin selection on the initial spread of cooperative behaviors. Here we investigated the role of kinship in cooperative feeding. We used a cross-fostering design to control for genetic relatedness and group membership. Our study animal was the periodic social spider Stegodyphus lineatus, a transitional species that belongs to a genus containing both permanent social and periodic social species. In S. lineatus, the young cooperate in prey capture and feed communally. We provide clear experimental evidence for net benefits of cooperating with kin. Genetic relatedness within groups and not association with familiar individuals directly improved feeding efficiency and growth rates, demonstrating a positive effect of kin cooperation. Hence, in communally feeding spiders, nepotism favors group retention and reduces the conflict between selfish interests and the interests of the group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18658236      PMCID: PMC2504791          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0804126105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

1.  Competitive foraging in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Cooperation and competition between relatives.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ido Pen; Ashleigh S Griffin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.

Authors:  M E Hauber; P W Sherman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 4.  Coupling cell movement to multicellular development in myxobacteria.

Authors:  Dale Kaiser
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Sociality in theridiid spiders: repeated origins of an evolutionary dead end.

Authors:  Ingi Agnarsson; Leticia Avilés; Jonathan A Coddington; Wayne P Maddison
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  Evolutionary explanations for cooperation.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ashleigh S Griffin; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Does population viscosity promote kin selection?

Authors:  D C Queller
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Gastric function and its contribution to the postprandial metabolic response of the Burmese python Python molurus.

Authors:  Stephen M Secor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 10.  Punish or perish? Retaliation and collaboration among humans.

Authors:  Karl Sigmund
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.712

View more
  12 in total

1.  Offspring dynamics affect food provisioning, growth and mortality in a brood-caring spider.

Authors:  Jasmin Ruch; Marie E Herberstein; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evidence of social niche construction: persistent and repeated social interactions generate stronger personalities in a social spider.

Authors:  Kate L Laskowski; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The 'Out of Africa' Hypothesis, Human Genetic Diversity, and Comparative Economic Development.

Authors:  Quamrul Ashraf; Oded Galor
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2013-02

4.  Mirror image stimulation could reverse social-isolation-induced aggressiveness in the high-level subsocial lactating spider.

Authors:  Bing Dong; Jing-Xin Liu; Rui-Chang Quan; Zhanqi Chen
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Subsocial behaviour and brood adoption in mixed-species colonies of two theridiid spiders.

Authors:  Lena Grinsted; Ingi Agnarsson; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-10-24

6.  Re-description of Xysticus bimaculatus L. Koch, 1867 (Araneae, Thomisidae) and characterization of its subsocial lifestyle.

Authors:  Jasmin Ruch; Torben Riehl; Peter Michalik
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 1.546

7.  Relatedness facilitates cooperation in the subsocial spider, Stegodyphus tentoriicola.

Authors:  Jasmin Ruch; Lisa Heinrich; Trine Bilde; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Family-specific chemical profiles provide potential kin recognition cues in the sexually cannibalistic spider Argiope bruennichi.

Authors:  Katharina Weiss; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.812

9.  The legacy effects of keystone individuals on collective behaviour scale to how long they remain within a group.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Evidence for loss of nepotism in the evolution of permanent sociality.

Authors:  Reut Berger-Tal; Yael Lubin; Virginia Settepani; Marija Majer; Trine Bilde; Cristina Tuni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.