Literature DB >> 32431472

Predictors of colony extinction vary by habitat type in social spiders.

Brendan L McEwen1, James L L Lichtenstein2, David N Fisher1, Colin M Wright3, Greg T Chism4, Noa Pinter-Wollman5, Jonathan N Pruitt1,2.   

Abstract

Many animal societies are susceptible to mass mortality events and collapse. Elucidating how environmental pressures determine patterns of collapse is important for understanding how such societies function and evolve. Using the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola, we investigated the environmental drivers of colony extinction along two precipitation gradients across southern Africa, using the Namib and Kalahari deserts versus wetter savanna habitats to the north and east. We deployed experimental colonies (n = 242) along two ~ 800-km transects and returned to assess colony success in the field after 2 months. Specifically, we noted colony extinction events after the 2-month duration and collected environmental data on the correlates of those extinction events (e.g., evidence of ant attacks, no. of prey captured). We found that colony extinction events at desert sites were more frequently associated with attacks by predatory ants as compared with savanna sites, while colony extinctions in wetter savannas sites were more tightly associated with fungal outbreaks. Our findings support the hypothesis that environments vary in the selection pressures that they impose on social organisms, which may explain why different social phenotypes are often favored in each habitat.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colony collapse; Disease; Extinction; Geographic variation; Local adaptation

Year:  2019        PMID: 32431472      PMCID: PMC7236762          DOI: 10.1007/s00265-019-2781-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol        ISSN: 0340-5443            Impact factor:   2.980


  35 in total

1.  Three energy variables predict ant abundance at a geographical scale.

Authors:  M Kaspari; L Alonso; S O'Donnell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The spatial patterns of directional phenotypic selection.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Kiyoko M Gotanda; Michael B Morrissey; Sarah E Diamond; Joseph D DiBattista; Stephanie M Carlson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Precipitation drives global variation in natural selection.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Michael B Morrissey; Mathieu Buoro; Stephanie M Carlson; Christina M Caruso; Sonya M Clegg; Tim Coulson; Joseph DiBattista; Kiyoko M Gotanda; Clinton D Francis; Joe Hereford; Joel G Kingsolver; Kate E Augustine; Loeske E B Kruuk; Ryan A Martin; Ben C Sheldon; Nina Sletvold; Erik I Svensson; Michael J Wade; Andrew D C MacColl
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Prey size, prey perishability and group foraging in a social spider.

Authors:  Ann L Rypstra; R Scott Tirey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Nest site and weather affect the personality of harvester ant colonies.

Authors:  Noa Pinter-Wollman; Deborah M Gordon; Susan Holmes
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  Social spider webs harbour largely consistent bacterial communities across broad spatial scales.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Tobin J Hammer; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Individual and Group Performance Suffers from Social Niche Disruption.

Authors:  Kate L Laskowski; Pierre-Olivier Montiglio; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.367

9.  Characterizing the collective personality of ant societies: aggressive colonies do not abandon their home.

Authors:  Inon Scharf; Andreas P Modlmeier; Stephan Fries; Claire Tirard; Susanne Foitzik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Repeatable group differences in the collective behaviour of stickleback shoals across ecological contexts.

Authors:  Jolle W Jolles; Kate L Laskowski; Neeltje J Boogert; Andrea Manica
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.