Literature DB >> 24177705

Social spiders of the genus Anelosimus occur in wetter, more productive environments than non-social species.

Marija Majer1, Ingi Agnarsson, Jens-Christian Svenning, Trine Bilde.   

Abstract

Latitude, rainfall, and productivity have been shown to influence social organisation and level of sociality in arthropods on large geographic scales. Social spiders form permanent group-living societies where they cooperate in brood care, web maintenance, and foraging. Sociality has evolved independently in a number of unrelated spider genera and may reflect convergent evolutionary responses to common environmental drivers. The genus Anelosimus contains a third of approximately 25 described permanently social spider species, eight to nine species that all occur in the Americas. To test for environmental correlates of sociality in Anelosimus across the Americas, we used logistic regression to detect effects of annual rainfall, productivity, and precipitation seasonality on the relative likelihood of occurrence of social and non-social Anelosimus spiders. Our analyses show that social species tend to occur at higher annual rainfall and productivity than non-social species, supporting the hypothesised effects of these environmental variables on the geographical distribution of social species. We did not find support for the hypothesis that permanently social species occur in areas with low precipitation seasonality. High annual precipitation and, to less extent, high productivity favour the occurrence of permanently group-living Anelosimus spiders relative to subsocial and solitary species. These results are partially consistent with previous findings for the Old World spider genus Stegodyphus, where a link between high habitat productivity and sociality was also found. Unlike Anelosimus, however, Stegodyphus typically occur in dry habitats negating a general importance of high precipitation for sociality. Sociality in spiders thus seems to be strongly linked to productivity, probably reflecting the need for relatively high availability of large prey to sustain social colonies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24177705     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-013-1106-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  20 in total

1.  Model selection in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Jerald B Johnson; Kristian S Omland
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Climate, energy and diversity.

Authors:  Andrew Clarke; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Multiple techniques confirm elevational differences in insect size that may influence spider sociality.

Authors:  Jennifer Guevara; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  The role of prey size and abundance in the geographical distribution of spider sociality.

Authors:  Kimberly S Powers; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Plant diversity controls arthropod biomass and temporal stability.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Borer; Eric W Seabloom; David Tilman; Vojtech Novotny
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Smaller colonies and more solitary living mark higher elevation populations of a social spider.

Authors:  Jessica Purcell; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 7.  Changing paradigms in insect social evolution: insights from halictine and allodapine bees.

Authors:  Michael P Schwarz; Miriam H Richards; Bryan N Danforth
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 19.686

8.  Iterative evolution of increased behavioral variation characterizes the transition to sociality in spiders and proves advantageous.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Christopher E Oufiero; Leticia Avilés; Susan E Riechert
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Spatio-temporal differentiation and sociality in spiders.

Authors:  Jessica Purcell; João Vasconcellos-Neto; Marcelo O Gonzaga; Jeffrey A Fletcher; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Quantitative Index of Sociality and Its Application to Group-Living Spiders and Other Social Organisms.

Authors:  Leticia Avilés; Gyan Harwood; W Koenig
Journal:  Ethology       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 1.897

View more
  3 in total

1.  Trait overdispersion and the role of sociality in the assembly of social spider communities across the Americas.

Authors:  Philippe Fernandez-Fournier; Jennifer Guevara; Catherine Hoffman; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Prey to predator body size ratio in the evolution of cooperative hunting-a social spider test case.

Authors:  Lena Grinsted; Mads F Schou; Virginia Settepani; Christina Holm; Tharina L Bird; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Cooperative foraging expands dietary niche but does not offset intra-group competition for resources in social spiders.

Authors:  Marija Majer; Christina Holm; Yael Lubin; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.