Literature DB >> 18682370

Gradients of precipitation and ant abundance may contribute to the altitudinal range limit of subsocial spiders: insights from a transplant experiment.

Jessica Purcell1, Leticia Avilés.   

Abstract

Species range boundaries often form along environmental gradients that dictate the success of the phenotypes present in each habitat. Sociality may allow colonization of environments where related species with a solitary lifestyle cannot persist. Social spiders in the genus Anelosimus appear restricted to low- and mid-elevation moist environments in the tropics, while subsocial spiders, common at higher elevations and latitudes, appear to be absent from the lowland tropical rainforest. Here, we seek factors that may simultaneously prevent subsocial Anelosimus species from colonizing the lowland rainforest while favouring species with large social groups in this habitat. To this end, we transplanted small groups of a subsocial species, which contain the offspring of a single female, from cloud forest habitat in the centre of its natural range to lower montane rainforest on the range margin and to lowland rainforest outside of the species range. Groups transplanted at the range margin and below their range limit were less likely to disperse and experienced increased mortality. This was correlated with greater rainfall intensity and ant abundance. We show that protection from rainfall enhances the performance of small groups of spiders in the lowland rainforest, and suggest that predation or disturbance by ants may influence the geographical range limits of this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18682370      PMCID: PMC2605798          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  10 in total

1.  Experimental studies of adaptation in Clarkia xantiana. II. Fitness variation across a subspecies border.

Authors:  Monica A Geber; Vincent M Eckhart
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Sociality in theridiid spiders: repeated origins of an evolutionary dead end.

Authors:  Ingi Agnarsson; Leticia Avilés; Jonathan A Coddington; Wayne P Maddison
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail?

Authors:  Jon R Bridle; Timothy H Vines
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  The evolution of species' distributions: reciprocal transplants across the elevation ranges of Mimulus cardinalis and M. lewisii.

Authors:  A L Angert; D W Schemske
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Multiple techniques confirm elevational differences in insect size that may influence spider sociality.

Authors:  Jennifer Guevara; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  The role of prey size and abundance in the geographical distribution of spider sociality.

Authors:  Kimberly S Powers; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Evolution of a species' range.

Authors:  M Kirkpatrick; N H Barton
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Colony size and individual fitness in the social spider Anelosimus eximius.

Authors:  L Avilés; P Tufiño
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Altitudinal patterns of spider sociality and the biology of a new midelevation social Anelosimus species in Ecuador.

Authors:  Leticia Avilés; Ingi Agnarsson; Patricio A Salazar; Jessica Purcell; Gabriel Iturralde; Eric C Yip; Kimberly S Powers; Todd C Bukowski
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Smaller colonies and more solitary living mark higher elevation populations of a social spider.

Authors:  Jessica Purcell; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.091

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Social spiders of the genus Anelosimus occur in wetter, more productive environments than non-social species.

Authors:  Marija Majer; Ingi Agnarsson; Jens-Christian Svenning; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-11-01

2.  Collective behavior and colony persistence of social spiders depends on their physical environment.

Authors:  Ambika Kamath; Skylar D Primavera; Colin M Wright; Grant N Doering; Kirsten A Sheehy; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Trait overdispersion and the role of sociality in the assembly of social spider communities across the Americas.

Authors:  Philippe Fernandez-Fournier; Jennifer Guevara; Catherine Hoffman; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Predictors of colony extinction vary by habitat type in social spiders.

Authors:  Brendan L McEwen; James L L Lichtenstein; David N Fisher; Colin M Wright; Greg T Chism; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Within-group behavioral variation promotes biased task performance and the emergence of a defensive caste in a social spider.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Susan E Riechert
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Spatio-temporal differentiation and sociality in spiders.

Authors:  Jessica Purcell; João Vasconcellos-Neto; Marcelo O Gonzaga; Jeffrey A Fletcher; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cooperative foraging expands dietary niche but does not offset intra-group competition for resources in social spiders.

Authors:  Marija Majer; Christina Holm; Yael Lubin; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.