Literature DB >> 29606787

Exposure to predators reduces collective foraging aggressiveness and eliminates its relationship with colony personality composition.

Colin M Wright1, James L L Lichtenstein1, Graham A Montgomery1,2, Lauren P Luscuskie1,2, Noa Pinter-Wollman2, Jonathan N Pruitt1.   

Abstract

Predation is a ubiquitous threat that often plays a central role in determining community dynamics. Predators can impact prey species by directly consuming them, or indirectly causing prey to modify their behavior. Direct consumption has classically been the focus of research on predator-prey interactions, but substantial evidence now demonstrates that the indirect effects of predators on prey populations are at least as strong as, if not stronger than, direct consumption. Social animals, particularly those that live in confined colonies, rely on coordinated actions that may be vulnerable to the presence of a predator, thus impacting the society's productivity and survival. To examine the effect of predators on the behavior of social animal societies, we observed the collective foraging of social spider colonies (Stegodyphus dumicola) when they interact with dangerous predatory ants either directly, indirectly, or both. We found that when colonies were exposed directly and indirectly to ant cues, they attacked prey with approximately 40-50% fewer spiders, and 40-90% slower than colonies that were not exposed to any predator cues. Furthermore, exposure to predatory ants disassociated the well-documented positive relationship between colony behavioral composition (proportion of bold spiders) and foraging aggressiveness (number of attackers) in S. dumicola, which is vital for colony growth. Thus, the indirect effects of predator presence may limit colony success. These results suggest that enemy presence could compromise the organizational attributes of animal societies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral syndrome; Personality; Predation; Temperament; Trait-mediated interaction

Year:  2017        PMID: 29606787      PMCID: PMC5871624          DOI: 10.1007/s00265-017-2356-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol        ISSN: 0340-5443            Impact factor:   2.980


  39 in total

1.  Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates.

Authors:  Jessica C Flack; Michelle Girvan; Frans B M de Waal; David C Krakauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals.

Authors:  D Sloan Wilson; A B Clark; K Coleman; T Dearstyne
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The protective function of the compact silk nest of social Stegodyphus spiders (Araneae, Eresidae).

Authors:  U Seibt; W Wickler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A real-time eco-evolutionary dead-end strategy is mediated by the traits of lineage progenitors and interactions with colony invaders.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 6.  Behavioural syndromes and social insects: personality at multiple levels.

Authors:  Jennifer M Jandt; Sarah Bengston; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt; Nigel E Raine; Anna Dornhaus; Andrew Sih
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2013-05-15

7.  Persistent social interactions beget more pronounced personalities in a desert-dwelling social spider.

Authors:  Andreas P Modlmeier; Kate L Laskowski; Alex E DeMarco; Anna Coleman; Katherine Zhao; Hayley A Brittingham; Donna R McDermott; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Evidence of social niche construction: persistent and repeated social interactions generate stronger personalities in a social spider.

Authors:  Kate L Laskowski; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Personality composition alters the transmission of cuticular bacteria in social groups.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Kimberly A Howell; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds.

Authors:  Lucy M Aplin; Damien R Farine; Richard P Mann; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  4 in total

1.  Collective behavior and colony persistence of social spiders depends on their physical environment.

Authors:  Ambika Kamath; Skylar D Primavera; Colin M Wright; Grant N Doering; Kirsten A Sheehy; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Spatial proximity and prey vibratory cues influence collective hunting in social spiders.

Authors:  Colin M Wright; James L L Lichtenstein; Lauren P Luscuskie; Graham A Montgomery; Sara Geary; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Carl N Keiser
Journal:  Isr J Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 0.559

3.  Predictors of colony extinction vary by habitat type in social spiders.

Authors:  Brendan L McEwen; James L L Lichtenstein; David N Fisher; Colin M Wright; Greg T Chism; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Intraindividual Behavioral Variability Predicts Foraging Outcome in a Beach-dwelling Jumping Spider.

Authors:  James L L Lichtenstein; Gregory T Chism; Ambika Kamath; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.