Literature DB >> 17218659

Effects of initial graft tension on the tibiofemoral compressive forces and joint position after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Mark F Brady1, Michael P Bradley, Braden C Fleming, Paul D Fadale, Michael J Hulstyn, Rahul Banerjee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The initial tension applied to an anterior cruciate ligament graft at the time of fixation modulates knee motion and the tibiofemoral compressive loads.
PURPOSE: To establish the relationships between initial graft tension, tibiofemoral compressive force, and the neutral tibiofemoral position in the cadaveric knee. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: The tibiofemoral compressive forces and joint positions were determined in the anterior cruciate ligament-intact knee at 0 degrees , 20 degrees , and 90 degrees of knee flexion. The anterior cruciate ligament was excised and reconstructed with a patellar tendon graft using graft tensions of 1, 15, 30, 60, and 90 N applied at 0 degrees , 20 degrees , and 90 degrees of knee flexion. The compressive forces and neutral positions were compared between initial tension conditions and the anterior cruciate ligament-intact knee.
RESULTS: Increasing initial graft tension increased the tibiofemoral compressive forces. The forces in the medial compartment were 1.8 times those in the lateral compartment. The compressive forces were dependent on the knee angle at which the tension was applied. The greatest compressive forces occurred when the graft was tensioned with the knee in extension. An increase in initial graft tension caused the tibia to rotate externally compared with the anterior cruciate ligament-intact knee (1.5 degrees and 7.7 degrees of external rotation when tensioned to 90 N at 0 degrees and 90 degrees of knee flexion, respectively). Increases in initial graft tension also caused a significant posterior translation of the tibia relative to the femur (0.9 and 5.3 mm of posterior translation when tensioned to 90 N at 0 degrees and 90 degrees of knee flexion, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Different initial graft tension protocols produced predictable changes in the tibiofemoral compressive forces and joint positions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The tibiofemoral compressive force and neutral joint position were best replicated with a low graft tension (1-15 N) when using a patellar tendon graft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17218659      PMCID: PMC1859866          DOI: 10.1177/0363546506294363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  65 in total

1.  Effects of femoral tunnel placement on knee laxity and forces in an anterior cruciate ligament graft.

Authors:  Keith L Markolf; Sharon Hame; D Monte Hunter; Daniel A Oakes; Bojan Zoric; Paul Gause; Gerald A M Finerman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Initial tension and anterior load-displacement behavior of high-stiffness anterior cruciate ligament graft constructs.

Authors:  Ari Karchin; M L Hull; S M Howell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  The biology of integration of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  D J Deehan; T E Cawston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-07

4.  Effect of tension and placement of a prosthetic anterior cruciate ligament on the anteroposterior laxity of the knee.

Authors:  B Fleming; B Beynnon; J Howe; W McLeod; M Pope
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Intraoperative assessment of tibiofemoral contact stresses in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A L Wallace; M L Harris; W R Walsh; W J Bruce
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An in vivo study in dogs.

Authors:  S Yoshiya; J T Andrish; M T Manley; T W Bauer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee.

Authors:  E S Grood; W J Suntay
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI.

Authors:  P F Hill; V Vedi; A Williams; H Iwaki; V Pinskerova; M A Freeman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-11

9.  Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A follow-up report.

Authors:  D B O'Neill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Significance of changes in the reference position for measurements of tibial translation and diagnosis of cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  C B Ma; M A Janaushek; T M Vogrin; T W Rudy; C D Harner; S L Woo
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  20 in total

1.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Tibiofemoral compression force differences using laxity- and force-based initial graft tensioning techniques in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed cadaveric knee.

Authors:  Braden C Fleming; Mark F Brady; Michael P Bradley; Rahul Banerjee; Michael J Hulstyn; Paul D Fadale
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Biomechanical techniques to evaluate tibial rotation. A systematic review.

Authors:  Mak-Ham Lam; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Does Anteromedial Portal Drilling Improve Footprint Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Authors:  Sally Arno; Christopher P Bell; Michael J Alaia; Brian C Singh; Laith M Jazrawi; Peter S Walker; Ankit Bansal; Garret Garofolo; Orrin H Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Effect of fixation angle and graft tension in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Yusuke Sasaki; Shih-Sheng Chang; Masataka Fujii; Daisuke Araki; Junjun Zhu; Brandon Marshall; Monica Linde-Rosen; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in restoration of knee kinematics and anterior cruciate ligament forces.

Authors:  Jong Keun Seon; Hemanth R Gadikota; Jia-Lin Wu; Karen Sutton; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  The effect of initial graft tension after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial with 36-month follow-up.

Authors:  Braden C Fleming; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Heidi L Oksendahl; Gary J Badger; Glenn A Tung
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Differences in tibial rotation during walking in ACL reconstructed and healthy contralateral knees.

Authors:  Sean F Scanlan; Ajit M W Chaudhari; Chris O Dyrby; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Effect of Loading on In Vivo Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics of Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Knees.

Authors:  Jarred M Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Richard Kijowski; Geoffrey Baer; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2015: MRI assessments of cartilage mechanics, morphology and composition following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Jarred Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Fang Liu; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.