Literature DB >> 11568194

Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A follow-up report.

D B O'Neill1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to further delineate the outcome of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in 125 patients who had previously been followed for two to five years. One of the original 125 patients was excluded from the present study because of insufficient follow-up, and an additional group of 101 patients was added. All 225 patients in the present study were followed for a minimum of six years.
METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to reconstruction with a double-stranded semitendinosus-gracilis graft with use of a two-incision technique (group I), reconstruction with a patellar ligament graft with use of a two-incision technique (group II), or reconstruction with a patellar ligament graft with use of a single-incision endoscopic technique (group III). The groups were compared with regard to the rate of graft failure, the amount of instability, knee strength, radiographic signs of degenerative changes, and functional outcome.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference among the three groups with regard to the rate of graft failure, the amount of knee instability, or the functional outcome. A normal or nearly normal functional outcome was recorded for 208 (92%) of the 225 patients. There were significant differences among the groups with regard to quadriceps muscle-strength deficits: group I had fewer patients with deficits than group III, and groups I and III both had fewer patients with deficits than group II (p = 0.04). There also were significant differences among the groups with regard to hamstring muscle-strength deficits: group III had fewer patients with deficits than group II, and group II had fewer patients with deficits than group I (p < 0.01). Twelve knees (16%) in group I, six knees (8%) in group II, and eight knees (11%) in group III showed radiographic evidence of progressive degenerative changes, but the differences among the three groups were not significant.
CONCLUSION: Although 11.6% of the 225 knees had radiographic evidence of degenerative arthritis at a minimum of six years after arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, the choice of graft and the technique of reconstruction did not seem to affect the rate of development of these changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11568194     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200109000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  23 in total

1.  Effects of graft pretensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Claude Guillard; Francois Lintz; Guillaume Anthony Odri; Denis Vogeli; Fabrice Colin; Sylvie Collon; Daniel Chappard; François Gouin; Henri Robert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Baseline predictors of health-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a longitudinal analysis of a multicenter cohort at two and six years.

Authors:  Warren R Dunn; Brian R Wolf; Frank E Harrell; Emily K Reinke; Laura J Huston; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft directly fixed to cortical bone: 5-year results.

Authors:  Francesco Giron; Paolo Aglietti; Pierluigi Cuomo; Nicola Mondanelli; Antonio Ciardullo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Effects of initial graft tension on the tibiofemoral compressive forces and joint position after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark F Brady; Michael P Bradley; Braden C Fleming; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Rahul Banerjee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Randomized prospective study of ACL reconstruction with interference screw fixation in patellar tendon autografts versus femoral metal plate suspension and tibial post fixation in hamstring tendon autografts: 5-year clinical and radiological follow-up results.

Authors:  Arsi Harilainen; Eric Linko; Jerker Sandelin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Brace or no-brace after ACL graft? Four-year results of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Hermann O Mayr; Paul Stüeken; Ernst-Otto Münch; Morris Wolter; Anke Bernstein; Norbert P Suedkamp; Amelie Stoehr
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 8.  Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Robert A Magnussen; Warren R Dunn; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The effect of patient and injury factors on long-term outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Curr Orthop Pract       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 10.  Meniscal and chondral loss in the anterior cruciate ligament injured knee.

Authors:  Hugh P Jones; Richard C Appleyard; Sanjeev Mahajan; George A C Murrell
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.