Literature DB >> 23144370

The effect of initial graft tension after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial with 36-month follow-up.

Braden C Fleming1, Paul D Fadale, Michael J Hulstyn, Robert M Shalvoy, Heidi L Oksendahl, Gary J Badger, Glenn A Tung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The initial graft tension applied at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction alters joint contact and may influence cartilage health. The objective was to compare outcomes between 2 commonly used "laxity-based" initial graft tension protocols. HYPOTHESES: (1) The high-tension group would have less knee laxity, improved clinical and patient-oriented outcomes, and less cartilage damage than would the low-tension group after 36 months of healing. (2) The outcomes of the high-tension group would be equivalent to those of a matched control group. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS: Ninety patients with isolated unilateral ACL injuries were randomized to undergo ACL reconstruction using 1 of 2 initial graft tension protocols: (1) autografts tensioned to restore normal anterior-posterior (AP) laxity at the time of surgery (ie, low tension; n = 46) and (2) autografts tensioned to overconstrain AP laxity by 2 mm (ie, high tension; n = 44). Sixty matched healthy patients formed the control group. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at 6, 12, and 36 months after surgery.
RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the 2 initial graft tension protocols for any of the outcome measures at 36 months. However, there were differences when comparing the 2 treatment groups to the control group. On average, AP laxity was 2 mm greater in the ACL-reconstructed groups than in the control group (P < .007). International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee evaluation scores, peak isokinetic knee extension torques, and 4 of 5 Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were significantly worse than the control group (P < .001, P < .027, and P < .05, respectively). Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores and reinjury rates were similar between groups at 36 months. Although there were significant changes in radiography and magnetic resonance imaging present in the ACL-reconstructed knees of both treatment groups, the magnitude was relatively small and likely clinically insignificant at 36 months.
CONCLUSION: Both laxity-based initial graft tension protocols produced similar outcomes without fully restoring joint function or patient-oriented outcomes (KOOS) when compared with the control group. There was minimal evidence of cartilage damage 36 months after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23144370      PMCID: PMC3534813          DOI: 10.1177/0363546512464200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  33 in total

1.  Substantial superiority of semiflexed (MTP) views in knee osteoarthritis: a comparative radiographic study, without fluoroscopy, of standing extended, semiflexed (MTP), and schuss views.

Authors:  J C Buckland-Wright; F Wolfe; R J Ward; N Flowers; C Hayne
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Graft tension and knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka; Kiyoshi Ouchi; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kosaku Mizuno
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon . A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads.

Authors:  Savio L-Y Woo; Akihiro Kanamori; Jennifer Zeminski; Masayoshi Yagi; Christos Papageorgiou; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament replacements: a mechanical study of femoral attachment location, flexion angle at tensioning, and initial tension.

Authors:  D I Bylski-Austrow; E S Grood; M S Hefzy; J P Holden; D L Butler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Determination of graft tension before fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  R T Burks; R Leland
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Bone contusion and associated meniscal and medial collateral ligament injury in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Yoon; Jae Ho Yoo; Kang-Il Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Comparison of clinical and dynamic knee function in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  Rohita R Patel; Debra E Hurwitz; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Bernard R Bach; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  C G Peterfy; A Guermazi; S Zaim; P F J Tirman; Y Miaux; D White; M Kothari; Y Lu; K Fye; S Zhao; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.576

View more
  19 in total

1.  Preoperative KOOS and SF-36 Scores Are Associated With the Development of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis at 7 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  J Kristopher Ware; Brett D Owens; Matthew R Akelman; Naga Padmini Karamchedu; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Gary J Badger; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Does Anteromedial Portal Drilling Improve Footprint Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Authors:  Sally Arno; Christopher P Bell; Michael J Alaia; Brian C Singh; Laith M Jazrawi; Peter S Walker; Ankit Bansal; Garret Garofolo; Orrin H Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Fixation techniques for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: early follow-up. A systematic review of level I and II therapeutic studies.

Authors:  Andrea Speziali; Marco Delcogliano; Matteo Tei; Giacomo Placella; Matteo Bartoli; Amerigo Menghi; Giuliano Cerulli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-10-01

4.  Tibial tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective seven-year study evaluating the effects of initial graft tensioning and graft selection.

Authors:  Steven F DeFroda; Naga Padmini Karamchedu; Brett D Owens; Steven L Bokshan; Kayleigh Sullivan; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Gary J Badger; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  3-T MRI mapping is a valid in vivo method of quantitatively evaluating the anterior cruciate ligament: rater reliability and comparison across age.

Authors:  Adam W Anz; Jos Edison; Thomas S Denney; Eric A Branch; Christopher R Walz; Kenny V Brock; Michael D Goodlett
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Effect of Matching or Overconstraining Knee Laxity During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Knee Osteoarthritis and Clinical Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 84-Month Follow-up.

Authors:  Matthew R Akelman; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Arlene Garcia; Kaitlyn E Chin; Jeffrey Duryea; Gary J Badger; Glenn A Tung; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  MRI volume and signal intensity of ACL graft predict clinical, functional, and patient-oriented outcome measures after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Alison M Biercevicz; Matthew R Akelman; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Gary J Badger; Glenn A Tung; Heidi L Oksendahl; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Return to Sports: A Risky Business? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Graft Rupture Following ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anna Cronström; Eva Tengman; Charlotte K Häger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 11.928

9.  Neuromuscular function in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed patients at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Analicia L Behnke; Lauren R Parola; Naga Padmini Karamchedu; Gary J Badger; Braden C Fleming; Jillian E Beveridge
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Wavelet analysis reveals differential lower limb muscle activity patterns long after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Payam Zandiyeh; Lauren R Parola; Braden C Fleming; Jillian E Beveridge
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.