Literature DB >> 17202230

Calibration of visually guided reaching is driven by error-corrective learning and internal dynamics.

Sen Cheng1, Philip N Sabes.   

Abstract

The sensorimotor calibration of visually guided reaching changes on a trial-to-trial basis in response to random shifts in the visual feedback of the hand. We show that a simple linear dynamical system is sufficient to model the dynamics of this adaptive process. In this model, an internal variable represents the current state of sensorimotor calibration. Changes in this state are driven by error feedback signals, which consist of the visually perceived reach error, the artificial shift in visual feedback, or both. Subjects correct for > or =20% of the error observed on each movement, despite being unaware of the visual shift. The state of adaptation is also driven by internal dynamics, consisting of a decay back to a baseline state and a "state noise" process. State noise includes any source of variability that directly affects the state of adaptation, such as variability in sensory feedback processing, the computations that drive learning, or the maintenance of the state. This noise is accumulated in the state across trials, creating temporal correlations in the sequence of reach errors. These correlations allow us to distinguish state noise from sensorimotor performance noise, which arises independently on each trial from random fluctuations in the sensorimotor pathway. We show that these two noise sources contribute comparably to the overall magnitude of movement variability. Finally, the dynamics of adaptation measured with random feedback shifts generalizes to the case of constant feedback shifts, allowing for a direct comparison of our results with more traditional blocked-exposure experiments.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17202230      PMCID: PMC2536620          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00897.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Reacquisition deficits in prism adaptation after muscimol microinjection into the ventral premotor cortex of monkeys.

Authors:  K Kurata; E Hoshi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task.

Authors:  R J Baddeley; H A Ingram; R C Miall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method.

Authors:  Gordon M Redding; Yves Rossetti; Benjamin Wallace
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Fluctuation-dissipation theorem and models of learning.

Authors:  Ilya Nemenman
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Modeling sensorimotor learning with linear dynamical systems.

Authors:  Sen Cheng; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Long-lasting aftereffect of a single prism adaptation: shifts in vision and proprioception are independent.

Authors:  Yohko Hatada; Yves Rossetti; R Chris Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Adaptive plasticity in the vestibulo-ocular responses of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  F A Miles; J H Fuller
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-11-22       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Variables affecting the intermanual transfer and decay of prism adaptation.

Authors:  C S Choe; R B Welch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-06

10.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements.

Authors:  C G Atkeson; J M Hollerbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  50 in total

1.  Learning on multiple timescales in smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The nervous system uses nonspecific motor learning in response to random perturbations of varying nature.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Daniel Wert; Konrad Körding
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Visual-shift adaptation is composed of separable sensory and task-dependent effects.

Authors:  M C Simani; L M M McGuire; P N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Persistence of motor memories reflects statistics of the learning event.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  How the required precision influences the way we intercept a moving object.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland; Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Tailoring reach-to-grasp to intended action: the role of motor practice.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Sensory reweighting in targeted reaching: effects of conscious effort, error history, and target salience.

Authors:  Hannah J Block; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Statistical assessment of the stability of neural movement representations.

Authors:  Ian H Stevenson; Anil Cherian; Brian M London; Nicholas A Sachs; Eric Lindberg; Jacob Reimer; Marc W Slutzky; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Lee E Miller; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Adaptation of surround inhibition in the human motor system.

Authors:  P Kassavetis; T A Saifee; A Sadnicka; I Pareés; M Kojovic; J C Rothwell; M J Edwards
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Uncertainty of feedback and state estimation determines the speed of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Konrad Körding
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.