Literature DB >> 19846617

Sensory reweighting in targeted reaching: effects of conscious effort, error history, and target salience.

Hannah J Block1, Amy J Bastian.   

Abstract

When both visual and proprioceptive information are available about the position of a part of the body, the brain weights and combines these sources to form a single estimate, often modeled by minimum variance integration. These weights are known to vary with different circumstances, but the type of information causing the brain to change weights (reweight) is unknown. Here we studied reweighting in the context of estimating the position of a hand for the purpose of reaching it with the other hand. Subjects reached to visual (V), proprioceptive (P), or combined (VP) targets in a virtual reality setup. We calculated weights for vision and proprioception by comparing endpoints on VP reaches with endpoints on P and V reaches. Endpoint visual feedback was manipulated to control completely for the error history seen by subjects. In different experiments, we manipulated target salience, conscious effort, or statistics of the visual error history to see if these cues could cause reweighting. Most subjects could reweight strongly by conscious effort. Changes in target salience reliably caused reweighting, but seen error history alone did not. We also found that experimental weights can be predicted by minimizing the variance of visual and proprioceptive estimates, supporting the idea that minimum variance integration is an important principle of sensorimotor processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19846617      PMCID: PMC2807220          DOI: 10.1152/jn.90961.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  26 in total

1.  Illusions. What you see is what you hear.

Authors:  L Shams; Y Kamitani; S Shimojo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Touch can change visual slant perception.

Authors:  M O Ernst; M S Banks; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth.

Authors:  R A Jacobs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Allocation of attention and the locus of adaptation to displaced vision.

Authors:  J A Kelso; E Cook; M E Olson; W Epstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers; Pierre Baraduc; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  On the plasticity of visual-proprioceptive bias effects.

Authors:  D H Warren; T L Schmitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Sensing limb movements in the motor cortex: how humans sense limb movement.

Authors:  Eiichi Naito
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.519

10.  Multisensory integration during motor planning.

Authors:  Samuel J Sober; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  14 in total

1.  Visual information gain and task asymmetry interact in bimanual force coordination and control.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sensory weighting and realignment: independent compensatory processes.

Authors:  Hannah J Block; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Sensory integration during reaching: the effects of manipulating visual target availability.

Authors:  Sajida Khanafer; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Adaptation to proprioceptive targets following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jenna C Flannigan; Ruth J Posthuma; Jesse N Lombardo; Chelsea Murray; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cerebellar involvement in motor but not sensory adaptation.

Authors:  Hannah J Block; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Proprioception-based movement goals support imitation and are disrupted in apraxia.

Authors:  Mitchell W Isaacs; Laurel J Buxbaum; Aaron L Wong
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  General variability leads to specific adaptation toward optimal movement policies.

Authors:  Sabrina J Abram; Katherine L Poggensee; Natalia Sánchez; Surabhi N Simha; James M Finley; Steven H Collins; J Maxwell Donelan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 10.900

8.  Virtual lesion of angular gyrus disrupts the relationship between visuoproprioceptive weighting and realignment.

Authors:  Hannah Block; Amy Bastian; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Cerebellar and prefrontal cortex contributions to adaptation, strategies, and reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  Subject-level differences in reported locations of cutaneous tactile and nociceptive stimuli.

Authors:  Peter Steenbergen; Jan R Buitenweg; Jörg Trojan; Bart Klaassen; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.