Literature DB >> 12684493

System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task.

R J Baddeley1, H A Ingram, R C Miall.   

Abstract

Sensory-motor integration has frequently been studied using a single-step change in a control variable such as prismatic lens angle and has revealed human visuomotor adaptation to often be partial and inefficient. We propose that the changes occurring in everyday life are better represented as the accumulation of many smaller perturbations contaminated by measurement noise. We have therefore tested human performance to random walk variations in the visual feedback of hand movements during a pointing task. Subjects made discrete targeted pointing movements to a visual target and received terminal feedback via a cursor the position of which was offset from the actual movement endpoint by a random walk element and a random observation element. By applying ideal observer analysis, which for this task compares human performance against that of a Kalman filter, we show that the subjects' performance was highly efficient with Fisher efficiencies reaching 73%. We then used system identification techniques to characterize the control strategy used. A "modified" delta-rule algorithm best modeled the human data, which suggests that they estimated the random walk perturbation of feedback in this task using an exponential weighting of recent errors. The time constant of the exponential weighting of the best-fitting model varied with the rate of random walk drift. Because human efficiency levels were high and did not vary greatly across three levels of observation noise, these results suggest that the algorithm the subjects used exponentially weighted recent errors with a weighting that varied with the level of drift in the task to maintain efficient performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12684493      PMCID: PMC6742112     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  24 in total

1.  Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields.

Authors:  N Bhushan; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  H A Ingram; P van Donkelaar; J Cole; J L Vercher; G M Gauthier; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Gon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Learning to move amid uncertainty.

Authors:  R A Scheidt; J B Dingwell; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations.

Authors:  W S Geisler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Effects of visual feedback on manual tracking and action tremor in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  X Liu; S A Tubbesing; T Z Aziz; R C Miall; J F Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Observer efficiency and weights in a multiple observation task.

Authors:  B G Berg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Adaptive Mixtures of Local Experts.

Authors:  Robert A Jacobs; Michael I Jordan; Steven J Nowlan; Geoffrey E Hinton
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 9.  Optimal estimator model for human spatial orientation.

Authors:  J Borah; L R Young; R E Curry
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination.

Authors:  D H Parish; G Sperling
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  64 in total

1.  Environmental experience within and across testing days determines the strength of human visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Semrau; Amy L Daitch; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The nervous system uses nonspecific motor learning in response to random perturbations of varying nature.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Daniel Wert; Konrad Körding
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Natural error patterns enable transfer of motor learning to novel contexts.

Authors:  Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Calibration of visually guided reaching is driven by error-corrective learning and internal dynamics.

Authors:  Sen Cheng; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural substrates of visuomotor learning based on improved feedback control and prediction.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton; Paul Schmitt; John Van Horn; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Modeling sensorimotor learning with linear dynamical systems.

Authors:  Sen Cheng; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Persistence of motor memories reflects statistics of the learning event.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  How the required precision influences the way we intercept a moving object.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland; Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Did I do that? Detecting a perturbation to visual feedback in a reaching task.

Authors:  Elon Gaffin-Cahn; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.