Literature DB >> 19494195

Persistence of motor memories reflects statistics of the learning event.

Vincent S Huang1, Reza Shadmehr.   

Abstract

Learning to control a new tool (i.e., a novel environment) produces an internal model, i.e., a motor memory that allows the brain to implicitly predict the behavior of the tool. Data from a wide array of experiments suggest that formation of motor memory is not a single process, but one that is due to multiple adaptive processes with different time constants. Here we asked whether these time constants are invariant or are they influenced by the statistics of the learning event. To measure the time constants, we controlled the statistics of the learning event in a reaching task and then assayed the decay rates of motor output in a set of trials in which errors were effectively removed. We found that prior experience with a rapid change in the environment increased the decay rate of memories acquired later in response to a gradual change in the same environment. Prior experience in an environment that changed gradually reduced the decay rates of memories acquired later in response to a rapid change in that same environment. Indeed we found that by manipulating the prior statistics of the learning experience, we could readily alter the decay rates of a given motor memory. This suggests that time scales of processes that support motor memory are not constant. Rather decay of motor memory is the brain's implicit estimate of how likely it is that the environment will change with time. During motor learning, prior statistics that suggest changes are likely to be permanent result in slowly decaying memories, whereas prior statistics that suggest changes are transient result in rapidly decaying memories.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19494195      PMCID: PMC2724341          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00237.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  24 in total

1.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements.

Authors:  R A Scheidt; D J Reinkensmeyer; M A Conditt; W Z Rymer; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task.

Authors:  R J Baddeley; H A Ingram; R C Miall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiments in human motor control.

Authors:  Opher Donchin; Joseph T Francis; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Two waves of a long-lasting aftereffect of prism adaptation measured over 7 days.

Authors:  Y Hatada; R C Miall; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Evolution of motor memory during the seconds after observation of motor error.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Adaptation and generalization in acceleration-dependent force fields.

Authors:  Eun Jung Hwang; Maurice A Smith; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions.

Authors:  F A Kagerer; J L Contreras-Vidal; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations.

Authors:  Jessica Klassen; Christine Tong; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.

Authors:  Maurice A Smith; Ali Ghazizadeh; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Alejandro Vazquez; Neel Pasricha; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Contributions of the motor cortex to adaptive control of reaching depend on the perturbation schedule.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Natural error patterns enable transfer of motor learning to novel contexts.

Authors:  Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Protection and expression of human motor memories.

Authors:  Sarah E Pekny; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Minimally invasive surgery training using multiple port sites to improve performance.

Authors:  Alan D White; Oscar Giles; Rebekah J Sutherland; Oliver Ziff; Mark Mon-Williams; Richard M Wilkie; J Peter A Lodge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Blocking trial-by-trial error correction does not interfere with motor learning in human walking.

Authors:  Andrew W Long; Ryan T Roemmich; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A shared resource between declarative memory and motor memory.

Authors:  Aysha Keisler; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning.

Authors:  Ryan T Roemmich; Andrew W Long; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.